Karnataka High Court
RPFC/266/2026 of SRI. PURUSHOTHAM. B. J, Vs SMT. SARASWATHI. G @HEMASHREE, on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010654892026 NC: 2026:KHC:52150 RPFC No. 266 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 266 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI. PURUSHOTHAM B.J., S/O. JAVARAIAH V.K. @
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 266 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
SRI. PURUSHOTHAM B.J.,
S/O. JAVARAIAH V.K. @ KEMPAIAH,
AGE 38 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 446,
2ND FLOOR,
4TH CROSS, NGOS COLONY,
KAMALANAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 079.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S. KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. SARASWATHI. G @ HEMASHREE,
W/O PURUSHOTHAM B.J.,
D/O. GANGADHAR R.,
AGE 36 YEARS,
2.
KUM. POSHIKA P.,
D/O. PURUSHOTHAM B.J.,
AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS,
MINOR REP BY HER MOTHER
RESPONDENT NO.1 HEREIN
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.103/1,
1ST MAIN, NEAR S.R. PRINTERS,
KERE ANGALA, KAMALANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 079
…RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed
by SUVARNA T
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY
COURT ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 25.05.2026 PASSED
ON I.A.NO.2 IN CRL.MISC NO.1001/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE
V
ADDITIONAL
PRINCIPAL
JUDGE,
FAMILY
COURT,
BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING I.A.NO.2 FILED UNDER
SECTION 144(1) OF BNSS FOR MAINTENANCE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
RPFC is filed questioning an interim order passed by the Family Court. The office has raised objection with regard to maintainability.
2. The office objection with regard to maintainability is upheld.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to convert this RPFC into WP. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to convert this RPFC into WP within a period of two weeks from today.
HC-KAR
4. For all statistical purposes, the petition is disposed of.
5. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15