Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/8172/2024 of HARSHAN Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010396642024 NC: 2026:KHC:52364 CRL.P No. 8172 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8172 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. HARSHAN S/O MALLESH AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8172 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
HARSHAN
S/O MALLESH
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,
R/AT-KAIYAMBALLI VILLAGE,
T NARSIPURA TALUK,
MYSURU DISTRICT-571 120
2.
SMT, SHIVAMMA,
W/O MALLESH,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
R/AT-KAIYAMBALLI VILLAGE,
T NARSIPURA TALUK,
MYSURU DISTRICT-571 120
3.
SMT, MAHADEVAMMA,
W/O LATE MARINANJAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
R/AT-KAIYAMBALLI VILLAGE,
T NARSIPURA TALUK,
MYSURU DISTRICT-571 120
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. NAGENDRA B, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY T.NARASIPURA POLICE STATION
REP BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560001.
2.
PUTTASWAMY
W/O LATE MARUMADAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
R/AT- KAYIAMBALLI VILLAGE,
T NARSIPURA TALUK,
MYSURU DISTRICT- 571 120
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT CRIME
NO.397/2021 (CC-26/2023) BY T NARASIPURA P.S FOR THE
OFFENCE P/U/S-504, 323, 324, 506, 114 R/W 34 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
COURT AT T NARASIPURA MYSORE DISTRICT, AGAINST THE
PRESENT PETITIONERS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. This Court ordered to issue notice to respondent No.2 on 07.02.2025. Despite, the petitioners have not paid process fee. As such, the matter is lying at the stage of orders since one year. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the
HC-KAR
petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same would be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 19