Karnataka High Court
WP/4962/2025 of R S RAVIKUMAR Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010096792025 NC: 2026:KHC:52136 WP No. 4962 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.4962 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: R.S. RAVIKUMAR, S/O SHANMUKHAWAMY, AGED ABOUT 41
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
WRIT PETITION NO.4962 OF 2025 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
R.S. RAVIKUMAR,
S/O SHANMUKHAWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
SRI RENUKA NILAYA,
2ND CROSS, MANDERA ROAD,
GOKULU EXTENSION,
TUMKUR - 572 104.
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. CHANDRIKA U., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. YASHODHAR HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
VISVESVARAYA JALA NIGAM LIMITED,
HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT
#148, GROUND FLOOR,
EMBASSY SQUARE, INFANTRY ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY
MANAGING
THE DIRECTOR AND CHAIRMAN,
DEPARMENT COMMITTEE.
2.
THE CHIEF ENGINEER,
VISVESVARAYA JALA NIGAM LIMITED,
Digitally signed by
MAHALAKSHMI B M
Location: High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
YETTINAHOLE PROJECT ZONE,
TUMKUR - 572 102.
3.
THE ENGINEER EXECUTIVE
VISVESVARAYA JALA NIGAM
LIMITED,
YETTINAHOLE PROJECT,
TUMKUR-572102
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRASHANTH B.R., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WP IS FILED PRAYING TO QUASHING THE
IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 18/12/2024 ISSUED BY THE FIRST
RESPONDENT (ANNEXURE-A) AND ISSUE ANY WRIT, ORDER
OR DIRECTION AS THIS COURT MAY DEEM FIT, IN THE
INTERESTS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has become infructuous and seeks permission to withdraw the same. A memo to that effect has also been filed, which reads as under:
HC-KAR
"The undersigned counsel for petitioner submits that as per Annexure-A of the petition, the impuned order was passed on 18.12.2024 debarring the petitioner for a term of one year that the time period of the same has elasped and thus the present petition has become infructuous, thus, in light of the same, the Hon'ble counsel for petitioner prays that the counsel may be with directed to withdraw the instant matter in the interest of justice and equity.
Wherefore, the counsel for petition humbly prays that the instant memo may be taken on record in the interest of justice and equity."
2. In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
TMP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2