Karnataka High Court
WP/18846/2025 of SRI MANJUNATH J H Vs THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010413162025 NC: 2026:KHC:52190 WP No. 18846 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 18846 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI MANJUNATH J H S/O J.C.HARISH GOWDA,
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010413162025
NC: 2026:KHC:52190
WP No. 18846 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
WRIT PETITION NO. 18846 OF 2025 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI MANJUNATH J H
S/O J.C.HARISH GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
RESIDING AT JOLDAL VILLAGE,
ALDUR HOBLI, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK,
CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 130
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAMESH J.L., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF TOWN AND
COUNTRY PLANNING
KSFC BUILDING, NEAR DISTRICT FIELD,
HOSAMANE EXTENSION ROAD,
CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577 101
… RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. MAMATHA SHETTY, AGA)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE
RESPONDENT TO APPROVE/SANCTION BUILDING PLAN IN
FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN THE LAND BEARING SY. NO.
27/2 MEASURING 0.5.04.00 GUNTAS WHICH IS CONVERTED
FROM
AGRICULTURAL
PURPOSE
TO
NON-AGRICULTURAL
PURPOSE AS PER THE RECOMMENDATION MADE BY THE
Digitally
signed by
PRAKASH N
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010413162025
NC: 2026:KHC:52190
WP No. 18846 of 2025
GRAMA PANCHAYATH TO THE RESPONDENT DATED 06.05.2025
MARKED AT ANNEXURE-E TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal reading as hereunder: "It is submitted that the petitioner is to be filed fresh petition before this Hon'ble court and hence, it is necessary to permit the petitioner to withdraw the present petition as not pressed and liberty to file fresh petition. Hence, this memo may be taken on record in the interest of justice."
2. In light of the said memo filed by the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as not pressed reserving liberty to challenge the impugned action/order. All contentions are kept open. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE NP