Karnataka High Court
WP/18090/2022 of SRI FAZIL A Vs BANK OF BARODA on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010411182022 NC: 2026:KHC:52093 WP No. 18090 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 18090 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. FAZIL A S/O SRI AKBAR KHAN AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO. 18090 OF 2022 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. FAZIL A
S/O SRI AKBAR KHAN
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
R/AT NO.T-4, A BLOCK, JASMIN APARTMENT
RAGHUVANAHALLI, KANAKAPURA ROAD
BENGALURU -560 062
AND ALSO AT
FLAT NO.205, A BLOCK, 2ND FLOOR
PRUTHVI ROYAL, GOTTIGERE VILLAGE
KALENA AGRAHARA -560083
BENGALURU.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MOHAMED ZULFIKHAR AHAMED, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
BANK OF BARODA
BRIGADE ROAD BRANCH, TRINITY CIRCLE
NO.41/2, GROUND FLOOR
VIJAYA TOWERS, VIJAYA TOWERS
M G ROAD TRINITY CIRCLE
BENGALURU -560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER
MR RAKESH KUMAR ARORA
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SHETTY VIGNESH SHIVARAM, ADVOCATE)
Verified
HC-KAR
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
DATED 28.07.2022 PASSED IN C.MISC.NO.3393/2022 BY THE HONBLE V ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE, VIDE ANNEXURE- D; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner, who is the borrower and admitted defaulter, has challenged the order dated 28.07.2022 passed in C.Misc.No.3393/2022 passed by the V Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru as per Annexure-D under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, “the SARFAESI Act”).
2. Though the Hon’ble Apex Court has consistently held that no indulgence would be granted to a default borrowers, when action is contemplated by the Secured Creditor under the provisions of SARFAESI Act,
Verified
HC-KAR
this Court vide order dated 26.09.2022 granted stay subject to deposit of Rs.6,00,000/- of the amount under three installments.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the interim order is not complied with and not a single rupee is deposited.
4. The petitioner, taking the undue advantage of the conditional interim order granted by this Court, has virtually stalled the recovery proceedings for close to four years.
5. It is now well settled by a catena of decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, consistently followed by this Court, that measures initiated by a secured creditor under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act are not ordinarily amenable to the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Verified
HC-KAR
Therefore, the writ petition is devoid of merits and accordingly, stands dismissed.
(SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17
Verified