Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/14236/2024 of RAJU J P @ KESHAVAMURTHY Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010759512024 NC: 2026:KHC:52370 CRL.P No. 14236 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14236 OF 2024 BETWEEN: RAJU J P @ KESHAVAMURTHY S/O LATE PUTTASWAMY AGED

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010759512024

NC: 2026:KHC:52370

CRL.P No. 14236 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14236 OF 2024

BETWEEN:

RAJU J P @ KESHAVAMURTHY

S/O LATE PUTTASWAMY

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

R/O JINNENAHALLI VILLAGE,

HIRISAVE HOBLI,

C.R.PATNA TALUK,

HASSAN - 573 116.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. PRANEETH G.N, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY HIRISAVE P.S.

REP BY SPP

HIGH COURT BUILDING

BANGALORE - 560 001.

2.

THAMMANNEGOWDA

S/O LATE HUCCHATHIMMEGOWDA

AGED 75 YEARS

JINNENAHALLI VILLAGE, HIRISAVE HOBLI,

CHANNARAYAPATANA TALUK

HASSAN DISTRICT-573124.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528

BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE C.C.NO.403/2024 ON THE FILE

OF THE HON'BLE ACJ AND J.M.F.C CHANNARAYAPATNA

(ANNEXURE-A).

Digitally signed

by PANKAJA S

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010759512024

NC: 2026:KHC:52370

CRL.P No. 14236 of 2024

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.

2. Though this matter is posted for seventh time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.

3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.

SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE

HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 29

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead