Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/870/2024 of H P SABJAN Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010108692022 NC: 2026:KHC:52358 CRL.P No. 870 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 870 OF 2024 BETWEEN: H.P SABJAN S/O M.PEER SAHED AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010108692022
NC: 2026:KHC:52358
CRL.P No. 870 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 870 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
H.P SABJAN
S/O M.PEER SAHED
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
AGRICULTURIST AND ADVOCATE
BY PROFESSION RESIDENT OF
2ND CROSS, HOLAKERE ROAD
MARAMMA TEMPLE
CHITRADURGA CITY
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577501.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. H.P. SABJAN, PARTY IN PERSON)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY CHITRADURGA KOTE POLICE
CHITRADURGA-577501
REPRESENTED BY H.C.G.P
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BANGALORE-560 001
2.
TIPU SULTHAN
S/O KHASIM SAB
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
HYDERSHAVALI DARGHA COMPLEX
BILL-COLLECTOR WORK
RESIDENT OF MARUTHINAGAR
CHITRADURGA-577501
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH
THE
ENTIRE
PROCEEDINGS
IN
CR.NO.144/2021
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010108692022
NC: 2026:KHC:52358
CRL.P No. 870 of 2024
INITIATED IN PURSUANCE OF OFFENCE P/U/S U/S 143, 147, 341, 323, 324, 504, 506 R/W 149 OF IPC ON THE FILE OF II
ADDITIONAL
SENIOR
CIVIL
JUDGE
AND
J.M.F.C.,
CHITRADURGA.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for sixth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/-
(RAJESH RAI K)
JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5