Karnataka High Court
MFA/4864/2025 of SMT ROOPA V Vs SRI SOMASHEKAR on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010423922025 NC: 2026:KHC:52320 MFA No. 4864 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4864 OF 2025 (CPC) BETWEEN: SMT ROOPA V W/O SRI. B.I.D. KUMAR
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4864 OF 2025 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT ROOPA V
W/O SRI. B.I.D. KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO. 235,
MARAMMA TEMPLE STREET
R T STREET CROSS, CHICKPET
BANGALORE - 560 053
…APPELLANT
(BY MS. ANUSHA, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. M. SRINIVASA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI SOMASHEKAR
S/O NOT KNWON
EX-CORPORATOR, BBMP
2.
SRI UDAYKUMAR K
S/O SRI KEMPANNA
AGED MAJOR
REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BANGALORE - 01
RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 ARE
R/AT NO. 361, AMRUTHANAGARA MAIN ROAD
Digitally
signed by
VINUTHA M
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
OPP: REAL HOME APARTMENTS
ANJANAPURA WARD NO.196
BANGALORE - 560 062
3.
SRI MANJUNATHA REDDY K V
S/O SRI VENKATARAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO. 103/1
4TH A CROSS, 1ST BLOCK
NARAYANA NAGARA
BANGALORE - 560 062
…RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED U/O 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST
THE ORDER DATED 02.04.2025 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 IN
OS.NO.3526/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE XL ADDITIONAL CITY
CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALUTU CITY (CCH-41), DISMISSING THE I.A.NO.1 FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1
AND 2 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel Ms.Anusha on behalf of learned counsel Sri.M.Srinivasa for the appellant is present and
HC-KAR
submits that the original suit proceedings have been decreed before the trial Court.
2. In view of the same, the present appeal does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE
RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32