Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/3297/2024 of SMT. AMEENA B Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010199492024 NC: 2026:KHC:52361 CRL.P No. 3297 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3297 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. AMEENA B W/O ABUBOOBACKER KANEETH AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3297 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. AMEENA B
W/O ABUBOOBACKER KANEETH
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
2.
SRI. ABBU BACKAR KANNETH
D/O ABUBOOCKAR KANNETH,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
3.
SMT. FARHATH ALIYA KANNETH
W/O ABBOOKER KENETH
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
4.
SMT. NALEEYA
S/O ABUBOOCKER KENNETH
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
PETITIONER NO.1 TO 3 & 5 ARE
R/AT NO.4, S.K.RESIDENCY,
VIVIANI ROAD, RICHARDS TOWN,
BANGALORE - 560 045.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. RAJESHWARI M, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
RETD BY WOMEN'S POLICE STATION,
EAST RANGE, SHIVAJINAGAR, BANGALORE CITY
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
REPRESENTED BY ITS
LEARNED STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT COMPLEX,
BANGALORE - 560001.
2.
SMT. ASIYA FATHIMA
D/O ABDUL RAHEEM,
AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 72/2 JUHA MANJIL
NEAR SATHYA SEVA SCHOOL
VENKATESHPURAM
BANGALORE - 560 045
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S. 482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE FIR NO.69/2024 IN EAST ZONE WOMEN P.S., FOR
THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498A,504,506,34 OF IPC AND SEC.3 OF
D.P ACT ON THE FILE OF THE VI A.C.M.M BENGALURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for ninth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the
HC-KAR
petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12