Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/5984/2019 of HOSURAMMA Vs L N SHARADAMMA on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010247132019 NC: 2026:KHC:52218 CRL.P No. 5984 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5984 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. HOSURAMMA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS W/O SHIVANNA 2. UMESHA
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5984 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
1.
HOSURAMMA
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
W/O SHIVANNA
2.
UMESHA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
S/O SHIVANNA
3.
CHANDRAMMA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
W/O UMESHA
4.
RATHNAMMA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
W/O MUNIYAPPA
5.
YALLAPPA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
H/O SUJATHAMMA
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF
HAGALAWADI GUBBI TALUK
TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572201.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VINAYA KEERTHY M., ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND:
1.
L N SHARADAMMA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
W/O H.S.DEVARAJ
ROPALAPURA VILLAGE
NIRUVAGAL POST
HANDANAKERE HOBLI
CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK
TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572201.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. SETHA G DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482
OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER
DATED 22.05.2019, PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRL. CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI, IN REGISTERING
THE
COMPLAINT
FILED
BY
THE
RESPONDENT
IN
C.C.N.238/2019 TAKING COGNISANCE OF THE OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 193, 199, 498A R/W 149 OF
IPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This matter is called twice i.e., in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session and there is representation on behalf of the petitioners. On 28.08.2026 also none appears for the petitioners. Hence, it is very clear that petitioners are not pursuing the matter diligently even though this petition is of the year 2019. Hence, the petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN