Karnataka High Court
CRP/626/2026 of SMT ESHWARAMMA Vs SMT CHANNAMMA on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010474392026 NC: 2026:KHC:52147 CRP No. 626 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 626 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SMT ESHWARAMMA W/O LATE D. KANUMAPPA, AGED
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010474392026
NC: 2026:KHC:52147
CRP No. 626 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 626 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
SMT ESHWARAMMA
W/O LATE D. KANUMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
R/AT ALANKAR TALKIES,
PAVAGADA TOWN,
PAVAGADA TALUK - 561 202.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. N. RAMALINGA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT CHANNAMMA
W/O LATE D.KANUMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS.
R/AT A.D.COLONY, PAVAGADA TOWN,
PAVAGADA TALUK - 561 202.
2.
SMT. NAGAMANI,
D/O. LATE D KANUMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS.
R/AT A.D.COLONY, PAVAGADA TOWN,
PAVAGADA TALUK - 561 202.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRP IS FILED U/S. 115 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN M.A.NO.5009/2023 DATED
04.03.2024 BY THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDE, TUMKURU SITTING AT MADHUGIRI AND ORDER PASSED
IN PA AND SC NO.2/2006 PASSED BY SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Digitally signed
by SUVARNA T
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010474392026
NC: 2026:KHC:52147
CRP No. 626 of 2026
AND JMFC, PAVAGADA DATED 24.03.2018 AND ALLOW THE
ABOVE APPEAL, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Office has raised objection regarding maintainability. Office objection regarding maintainability is upheld.
2. Accordingly, the CRP is disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy within two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order.
3. The registry is directed to return all the documents by retaining the xerox copies.
4. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5