Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/3059/2024 of SMT. HASEENA PARVEEN K, Vs STATE BY WOMEN POLICE STATION on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010186412024 NC: 2026:KHC:52359 CRL.P No. 3059 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3059 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SMT. HASEENA PARVEEN K, W/O SYED PRAVEEZ AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010186412024
NC: 2026:KHC:52359
CRL.P No. 3059 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3059 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SMT. HASEENA PARVEEN K,
W/O SYED PRAVEEZ
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/O II STAGE, RML NAGAR,
SHIVAMOGGA-577201.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. IQBAL AHMED KHAN, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
STATE BY WOMEN POLICE STATION
SHIVAMOGGA REPT BY ITS
HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER
HIGH COURT BUILDING
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BANGALORE-560 001
2.
SAMEENA BANU
W/O K. MOHAMMED SHAKIL
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/AT R.M.L NAGAR
SHIVAMOGGA TOWN
SHIVAMOGGA-577 201
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO
QUASH THE FIR REGISTERED BY THE WOMEN POLICE IN
CR.NO.09/2024, SEC. 498(A),323,504,506,114 R/W 34 OF IPC
AND SEC.3,4 OF D.P ACT PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 2ND
ADDL.J.M.F.C COURT AT SHIVAMOGGA BY ALLOWING THE
PETITION.
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010186412024
NC: 2026:KHC:52359
CRL.P No. 3059 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for ninth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/-
(RAJESH RAI K)
JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 10