Karnataka High Court

WP/27776/2026 of SMT. DEVI Vs SMT. MANAGALA K S on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010608382026 NC: 2026:KHC:52175 WP No. 27776 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 27776 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. DEVI W/O. K.C. KUMAR, D/O SRI. LATE K.P.

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

WRIT PETITION NO. 27776 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

1.

SMT. DEVI

W/O. K.C. KUMAR,

D/O SRI. LATE K.P. SUBRAMANYAM

AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,

2.

SRI. SHIVAKUMAR

S/O LATE SRI. K.P. SUBRAMANYAM.

AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,

3.

SMT. RAMA

W/O LATE SRI. K.P. SUBRAMANYAM

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,

4.

SRI. NANDKUMAR S.,

S/O LATE SRI. K.P. SUBRAMANYAM

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,

ALL ARE R/AT

NO. 832, GROUND FLOOR,

5TH CROSS, 9TH MAIN, HRBR 1ST BLOCK,

KALYANNAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 043.

…PETITIONERS

Digitally signed

by VINUTHA B

S

Location: High

Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

(BY SRI. PRADEEP NAIK K., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SMT. MANAGALA K.S.,

W/O LATE SRI. LAKSHMIKANTH N.,

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

R/AT NO.: SUVARNA NILAYA

GOTTIGHERE VILLAGE,

BANNERGHATTA MAIN,

BENGALURU - 560 083.

…RESPONDENT

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE

IMPUGNED ORDER WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE A TO THIS WRIT

PETITION I.E. ORDER DATED 05-08-2026 PASSED ON I.A. NO.

16 IN THE COURT OF XXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS

JUDGE AT BENGALURU (CCH-23) FILED BY THE RESPONDENT /

DEFENDANT UNDER VII RULE 14 R/W SECTION 151 OF THE

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IN O.S. NO. 7789/2014, C/W O.S.

NO. 4825/2014 AND DISMISS THE APPLICATION BY ALLOWING

THIS WRIT PETITION AND ETC,.

THIS

PETITION,

COMING

ON

FOR

PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

HC-KAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Sri Pradeep Naik, learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo dated 22.09.2026, which reads as under: "The Petitioners submit that, they do not want to press the above petition. The Petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the above petition and Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn, hence this memo."

In view of the said memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE

DDU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead