Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/6603/2024 of GOVINDASWAMY Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010353372024 NC: 2026:KHC:52362 CRL.P No. 6603 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6603 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. GOVINDASWAMY S/O YELLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6603 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
GOVINDASWAMY
S/O YELLAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
R/A NO. 26, 7TH CROSS,
6TH MAIN, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD,
CHAMUNDESHWARI NAGAR,
BEGUR POST, BOMMANAHALLI,
BANGALORE-560068.
2.
SARAVANA NANJAN
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 1/166
POOMANDAHALL, PALACODE,
PERIYANAHALLI POST, MODUR,
DHARMAPURAI DISTRICT-635 205.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. DILRAJ JUDE ROHIT SEQUEIRA, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BEGUR POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY THE STATE,
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BANGALORE-560001.
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
KANNIYAMMAI PALANI
W/O LATE PALANI MARIMUTTU,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
R/A NO. 151/143,PATTADARAN,
KOTTAI, ARIMANGALAM POST,
PALKODU TALUK, DHARMAPURI
TAMIL NADU-635111.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
ALLOW THIS PETITION AND QUASH ALL THE FURTHER
PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTIONS WITH FIR, COMPLIANT AND
ALL THE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH
CRIME NO.425/2023 FOR THE OFFENCE P/US/ 304-A OF IPC
PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE COURT OF 41ST
ACMM, BENGALURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
HC-KAR
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 14