Karnataka High Court
WP/13506/2025 of SRI VIJAYKUMAR KUCHANURE Vs THE KARNATAKA STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010279132025 NC: 2026:KHC:52180 WP No. 13506 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.13506 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI VIJAYKUMAR KUCHANURE S/O DHANPAL KUCHANURE
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010279132025
NC: 2026:KHC:52180
WP No. 13506 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
WRIT PETITION NO.13506 OF 2025 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI VIJAYKUMAR KUCHANURE
S/O DHANPAL KUCHANURE
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
MEMBER, KARNATAKA STATE
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,
R/O 07, DHANMITHRA, 2ND STAGE,
KAVERI NAGAR, TILAKWADI,
BELGAUM-590006.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RITHIK Y.M., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. SUYOG HERELE E., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE KARNATAKA STATE
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
UDYOGA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-01
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
2.
SRI. SHIVA SHANKARAPPA S. SAHUKAR
MAJOR,
FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
CHAIRMAN, KPSC
OFF/AT KPSC,
UDYOGA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-01.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K.M. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 (V.C.)
SRI. SANDEEP HUILGOL, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
Digitally signed by
MAHALAKSHMI B M
Location: High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010279132025
NC: 2026:KHC:52180
WP No. 13506 of 2025
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED MEMORANDUM DATED 03.04.2025 IN NO. CE:04/2025- 26/PSC ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND ALL FURTHER
PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERETO IN THE INTEREST OF
JUSTICE AND EQUITY (PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A).
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
HEARING
–
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE
THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the term of the petitioner has been completed. Therefore, the petitioner does not intend to prosecute the petition.
2. The question involved in the present petition is whether the Act confers any power upon respondent No.2 - the Chairman of the Karnataka State Public Service Commission [KSPSC] to issue any memorandum / notice.
3. The said issue is not dealt with in the present petition.
4. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
MBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11