Karnataka High Court
WP/28927/2026 of SMT. PADMAMMA Vs PRATHAPGIRI on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010634392026 NC: 2026:KHC:52782 WP No. 28927 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 28927 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PADMAMMA W/O. LATE LAKSHMANA, AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
WRIT PETITION NO. 28927 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. PADMAMMA
W/O. LATE LAKSHMANA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
2.
VENKATEGOWDA SHIVAKUMAR,
S/O. LATE LAKSHMANA,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
3.
PRATHAP
S/O. LATE LAKSHMANA,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
ALL RESIDENTS OF
PURADADODDI VILLAGE,
HALAGURU HOBLI,
MALAVALLI TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT 571 421.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. R.V. NAIK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
PRATHAPGIRI
S/O. LATE LAKSHMANA,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
Digitally
signed by
VINUTHA B S
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
2.
RASHMI
D/O. LATE LAKSHMANA,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
3.
SMT. SAVITHRAMMA
W/O. LATE LAKSHMANA,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 ARE
RESIDENTS OF BANASAMUDRA VILLAGE,
NEAR MARAMMA TEMPLE,
KASABA HOBLI -2, MALAVALLI TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT,
PIN CODE 571 430.
4.
SMT. GIRIGAMMA,
W/O. LATE VENKATEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
5.
SMT. SUGUNA,
D/O. LATE RAMACHANDRA,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS.
6.
VENKATESHA
7.
SMT. PADMAMMA,
8.
SMT. LAKSHMAMMA,
9.
SRINIVASA,
HC-KAR
R/O. T. K. HALLI VILLAGE,
HALAGURU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT 571 421
10.
ERAJU
S/O. LATE HUCHAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
11.
SMT. PREMA
D/O. LATE KULLEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
12.
SMT. LAKSHMI
D/O. LATE KULLEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
13.
SMT. SHIVAMMA
W/O. LATE VENKATESH,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
14.
KUMAR
S/O. LATE VENKATESH,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
15.
CHINNASWAMY
S/O. LATE VENKATEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
16.
SMT. GURULAKSHMAMMA,
W/O. LATE RAMASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
17.
SURESHA
S/O. LATE RAMASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
18.
KRISHNA
S/O. LATE RAMASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
HC-KAR
19.
GOPI
S/O. LATE RAMASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS 10 TO 19
RESIDENTS OF PURADADODDI VILLAGE,
HALAGURU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT 571 421.
20.
SMT. SHARADAMMA
D/O. LATE JAYAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
21.
BASAVARAJU
S/O. LATE JAYAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
22.
NAGARAJU
S/O. LATE JAYAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS 20 TO 22
RESIDENTS OF MARIJOGIDODDI VILLAGE,
HALAGURU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT 571 421.
23.
SMT. VENKATAMMA,
AND W/O. CHIKKATHAMMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS 23 R/O.
T. K. HALLI VILLAGE, HALAGURU HOBLI,
MALAVALLI TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT 571 421.
24.
SMT. SHRUTHI
W/O. KRISHNA,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
HC-KAR
25.
SMT. LAKSHMAMMA
W/O. CHINNASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS 24 & 25
RESIDENTS OF PURADADODDI VILLAGE,
HALAGURU HOBLI,
MALAVALLI TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT 571 421.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL
FOR THE RECORDS OF THE CASE, O. S. NO.35/2022 ON THE
FILE OF THE COURT OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT
MALAVALLI, AND AFTER LOOKING INTO THE LEGALITY AND
VALIDITY OF THE ORDER DATED 22-06-2022 PASSED ON I.A.
NO.4 IN O. S. NO. 35/2022, ANNEXURE-A, BY THE COURT OF
THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT MALAVALLI, SET ASIDE
THE SAME AND FURTHER DISMISS THE SUIT AS NOT
MAINTAINABLE, IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Office has raised objection with regard to maintainability.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file Civil Revision Petition.
3. Subject to liberty as prayed for, the petition is dismissed as not maintainable.
If a request is made for returning of certified copies, the registry shall return the same, after retaining xerox copies of same.
Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
VP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 145