Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/14079/2024 of SRI. CHENISH KUMAR Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA BY on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010747252024 NC: 2026:KHC:52107 CRL.P No. 14079 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14079 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. CHENISH KUMAR S/O. GANESHAN AGED ABOUT 33

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14079 OF 2024

BETWEEN:

SRI. CHENISH KUMAR

S/O. GANESHAN

AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

RESIDING AT, G-4, MADHUKUNJ CHS,

DINDAYAL ROAD, NEAR SAMRAT HOTEL,

THAKUR WADI, DOMBIVLI DISTRICT

THANE, MAHARASHTRA -421 202.

PRESENTLY R/AT, BHASKAR NIVAS

TRIMOORTHI LAYOUT

PANDESHWARA

MANGALORE - 575 001.

…PETITIONER

(BY SMT. LAKSHONY YENGAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR

SRI. MANJUNATHA A.C, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

BY MANGALORE WOMEN POLICE STATION

MANGALORE - 575 001.

REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

BENGALURU - 560 001

2.

SMT.PALLAVI VERMA

D/O. KAMAL KISHAN VERMA

AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

Digitally signed

by PANKAJA S

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

SUBHASH CHOWK,

MOTIPUR RAJNANDGAON

CHHATTISGARH - 491 001.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1,

SRI. LOKESHA K, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528

BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT PENDING

ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED 3RD JMFC COURT, MANGALORE

IN CR.NO.94/2024 FOR THE OFFENCE P/US 69 OF THE BNS, 2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND B AND GRANT SUCH OTHER

RELIEF OR RELIEFS AS THIS HONOURABLE COURT DEEMS FIT

TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

After arguing the matter for some time, the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition by reserving liberty to the petitioner to place all the documents which he relied in this petition as his defence before the investigation officer.

2. The counsel submission is accepted and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is at liberty to place all the documents he relied in this petition

HC-KAR

before the investigation officer as his defence within two weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.

3. Upon such production, the investigation officer shall consider those documents before filing the final report.

SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE

CR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead