Karnataka High Court

WP/52237/2019 of JAGADEESH MASARAKAL Vs UNION OF INDIA on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010488412019 NC: 2026:KHC:52242 WP No. 52237 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 52237 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. JAGADEESH MASARAKAL S/O.

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010488412019

NC: 2026:KHC:52242

WP No. 52237 of 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

WRIT PETITION NO. 52237 OF 2019 (GM-RES)

BETWEEN:

1.

JAGADEESH MASARAKAL

S/O. HANAMANTHAPPA MASARKAR,

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,

R/AT B-1101, 11TH FLOOR,

MAYFAIR SYMPHONY, SPRINGS CHS LTD

GODREJ, HIRANANDANI LINK ROAD,

OFF LBS ROAD, VIKHRO,

MUMBAI-400 079.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. HIREMATH PRAVEENKUMAR APPAYYA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

UNION OF INDIA

REPRESENTED BY MINISTRY OF

CORPORATE AFFAIRS,

SHASTRI BHAWAN,

DR. RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD,

NEW DELHI-110 001.

2.

REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES

E WING, 2ND FLOOR,

KENDRIYA SADAN, KORAMANGALA,

BANGALORE-560 034.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. K.S. BHEEMAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2)

Digitally Signed By:

SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

Verified

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010488412019

NC: 2026:KHC:52242

WP No. 52237 of 2019

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED

LIST PUBLISHED BY R-1 IN ITS OFFICIAL WEBSITE ANENXIRE- A AS FAR IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONER; AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING

‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the captioned petition is rendered infructuous.

Recording his submission, petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.

Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE

CA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37

Digitally Signed By: SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead