Karnataka High Court

RFA/822/2020 of SRI K S KUMAR Vs SHIDDARAMAPPA on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010130432020 NC: 2026:KHC:52159 RFA No. 822 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 822 OF 2020 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.K.S.KUMAR S/O SHIDDARAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 51

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 822 OF 2020 (PAR)

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI.K.S.KUMAR

S/O SHIDDARAMAPPA

AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS

AGRICULTURIST

R/O KATIGENERE VILLAGE

AJJAMPURE HOBLI

TARIKERE TALUK

CHIKMAGALORE DIST – 577 228

NOW R/O CHIKKAGANGUR VILLAGE

CHANNAGIRI TALUK

DAVANAGERE DIST – 577 213

2.

SMT.SHAKUNTHALA

W/O SRI.NEELANDHARA

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

R/AT KATHIGENERE VILLAGE

AJJAMPURA HOBLI

CHICKMAGALUR DIST – 577 228 … APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. MUNIYAPPA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SHIDDARAMAPPA

S/O BASAPPA

AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS

2.

KAMALAMMA

Digitally

signed by

SUSHMA

LAKSHMI B

S

Location:

High Court

of Karnataka

HC-KAR

W/O SHIDDARAMAPPA

AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS

3.

DEVENDRAPPA

S/O SIDDARAMAPPA

AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS

4.

NAGARAJA

S/O SIDDARAMAPPA

AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS

5.

SACHIN D.

S/O DEVENDRAPPA

AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

6.

SANJAY D.

S/O DEVENDRAPPA

AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS

RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 6

ARE AGRICULTURISTS

R/O KATIGENERE VILLAGE

AJJAMPURE HOBLI

TARIKERE TALUK

CHICKMAGALORE DIST – 577 228 …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.NAGARAJA R.C., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R6)

----

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.12.2019

PASSED IN OS.NO.5/2019 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL

JUDGE AND JMFC., AT CHANNAGIRI, PARTLY DECREEING THE

SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR “TO COMPLY THE ORDER

OF DIVISION BENCH”, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE

FOLLOWING:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

HC-KAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo of even date seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the appeal.

2. Memo is taken on record.

3. Considering the same, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application, if any, does not survive for consideration and the same is also disposed of.

Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

BSS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead