Karnataka High Court
RFA/822/2020 of SRI K S KUMAR Vs SHIDDARAMAPPA on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010130432020 NC: 2026:KHC:52159 RFA No. 822 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 822 OF 2020 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.K.S.KUMAR S/O SHIDDARAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 51
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 822 OF 2020 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI.K.S.KUMAR
S/O SHIDDARAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
AGRICULTURIST
R/O KATIGENERE VILLAGE
AJJAMPURE HOBLI
TARIKERE TALUK
CHIKMAGALORE DIST – 577 228
NOW R/O CHIKKAGANGUR VILLAGE
CHANNAGIRI TALUK
DAVANAGERE DIST – 577 213
2.
SMT.SHAKUNTHALA
W/O SRI.NEELANDHARA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R/AT KATHIGENERE VILLAGE
AJJAMPURA HOBLI
CHICKMAGALUR DIST – 577 228 … APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. MUNIYAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SHIDDARAMAPPA
S/O BASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS
2.
KAMALAMMA
Digitally
signed by
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI B
S
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
W/O SHIDDARAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
3.
DEVENDRAPPA
S/O SIDDARAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
4.
NAGARAJA
S/O SIDDARAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
5.
SACHIN D.
S/O DEVENDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
6.
SANJAY D.
S/O DEVENDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS
RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 6
ARE AGRICULTURISTS
R/O KATIGENERE VILLAGE
AJJAMPURE HOBLI
TARIKERE TALUK
CHICKMAGALORE DIST – 577 228 …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.NAGARAJA R.C., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R6)
----
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.12.2019
PASSED IN OS.NO.5/2019 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC., AT CHANNAGIRI, PARTLY DECREEING THE
SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR “TO COMPLY THE ORDER
OF DIVISION BENCH”, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo of even date seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the appeal.
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. Considering the same, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application, if any, does not survive for consideration and the same is also disposed of.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
BSS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47