Karnataka High Court

WP/20937/2026 of SRI. H V SOMASHEKAR Vs SRI. H D MUNISHAMAPPA @ MUNISHAMI on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010459712026 NC: 2026:KHC:52189 WP No. 20937 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 20937 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. H.V. SOMASHEKAR S/O. LATE SRI.

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

WRIT PETITION NO. 20937 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI. H.V. SOMASHEKAR

S/O. LATE SRI. VENKATAPPA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,

RESIDING AT, NO.23, 6TH CROSS,

VENKATESHPURA LAYOUT,

KRISHNA EXCELLENCY APARTMENT,

5TH FLOOR, PENT HOUSE,

BANGALORE - 560 029.

2.

SRI. H.V. GAJARAJ,

S/O. LATE VENKATAPA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.34, MADAN DEEP,

BTM LAYOUT, 1ST STAGE,

TAVAREKERE VILLAGE,

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA K., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SRI. H.D. MUNISHAMAPPA @ MUNISHAMI

S/O LATE DODDA ABBAIAH,

SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS,

SMT. GOWRAMMA,

W/O. LATE. H.D. MUNISHAMAPPA,

Digitally

signed by

VINUTHA B S

Location:

High Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,

R/AT HALANAYAKANAHALLI,

VARTHUR HOBLI, CARMELARAM POST,

BANGALORE EAST TALUK - 560 087.

2.

SRI. KRISHNA REDDY,

S/O LATE H.D. MUNISHAMAPPA,

SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS,

SMT. SHASHAKALA,

W/O. LATE KRISHNA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

3.

SRI. K. SAGAR,

S/O. LATE KRISHNA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,

4.

SRI. K. SANTHOSH,

S/O. LATE KRISHNA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 4 ARE

RESIDING AT NO.14/15,

SAGAR SANTHOSH NILAYA,

4TH MAIN, 7TH CROSS, NAVODAYA NAGAR,

J.P NAGAR, 7TH PHASE,

5.

SMT. LALITHAMAMMA,

W/O SRI. NAGARAJU REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,

R/AT NO.491, 2ND DIVISION,

JIGANI DOUBLE ROAD,

JIGANI, ANEKAL TALUK,

BANGALORE DISTRICT - 560 105.

6.

H.M. CHANDRASHEKAR,

S/O. LATE H.D. MUNISHAMAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

HC-KAR

R/AT HALANAYAKANA HALLI,

VARTHUR HOBLI, CARMELERAM POST,

BANGALORE EAST TALUK - 560 087.

7.

SRI. H.M. RAVI,

S/O. LATE H.D MUNISHAMAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,

R/AT NO. 16/2, BELLANDUR GATE,

NEAR CRYSTAL APARTMENT,

AMBLIPURA, BANGALORE - 560 103.

8.

SRI. H.M. JANARDHANA,

S/O LATE H.D. MUNISHAMAPPA,

SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS,

SMT. THARAKESHWARI,

W/O. LATE. H.M JANARDHANA

@ JANARDHANA REDDY

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,

9.

SMT. THRISHMA,

D/O. LATE. H.M. JANARDHANA

@ JANARDHANA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,

10.

H.J. DHANUSHREE,

D/O. LATE. H.M. JANARDHANA

@ JANARDHANA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,

RESPONDENT NOS.8 TO 10 ARE

R/AT NO.24, FLAT NO.203

MITHILA PARADICE OWNERS COURT WEST

KASAVANA HALLI, SARJAPURA ROAD,

BENGALORE - 560 035.

11.

SRI. H.M. LAKSHMANA REDDY,

S/O. LATE. H.D. MUNISHAMAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

HC-KAR

R/AT NO.9, 2ND CROSS,

RAJIV GANDHI ROAD, JARAGANA HALLI,

J.P.NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 078.

12.

SMT. NIRMALA,

W/O. SRI. M. RAVI,

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

R/AT NO.17, 2ND CROSS,

MINI REDDY LAYOUT,

CHIKKA BANASAWADI,

BANGALORE - 560 043.

13.

SRI. H.D. NARAYANA REDDY,

S/O LATE DODDA ABBAIAH,

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,

14.

SRI. H.D. PILLAIAH,

S/O. LATE DODDA ABBAIAH,

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,

ALL ARE R/AT, HALANAYAKANA HALLI VILLAGE, HOBLI, CARMELSRSM POST,

15.

SRI. ANAND,

S/O. LATE H. NARAYANA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

16.

SRI. SURESHA,

S/O LATE H. NARAYANA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,

17.

SMT. GOWRAMMA,

W/O LATE H. NARAYANA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,

18.

SMT. PREMA,

D/O LATE H. NARAYANA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

HC-KAR

19.

SMT. SUMITRAMMA,

D/O. LATE H. NARAYANA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

20.

SRI. KIRAN,

S/O. LATE. KOMALA,

GRANDSON OF LATE H. NARAYANA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,

21.

KUM. SWETHA,

D/O LATE INDIRARNMA,

GRANDDAUGHTER OF

LATE H. NARAYANA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,

22.

SMT. AMBUJA,

D/O. LATE H. NARAYANA REDDY.

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,

23.

SRI. H. D. RAMA REDDY,

S/O. LATE DODDA ABBAIAH REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,

RESPONDENT NOS.15 TO 23 ARE

R/AT HALANAYAKANAHALLI, VARTHUR HOBLI,

CARMELARAM POST,

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. J. V. CHANDRA SHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R14)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF

CERTIORARI OR PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER AND QUASH THE

ORDERS PASSED BY THE HON'BLE IV ADDL SENIOR CIVIL

JUDGE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT AT BENGALURU, ON THE

FILE OF O.S. NO.730/2008 DATED, 01-06-2026 ANNEXURE-A,

HC-KAR

IN RESPECT OF I.A. FILED UNDER ORDER I, RULE 10(2) R/W

SECTION 151 OF CPC CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE SAID IA AS

PRAYED FOR IN ITS ENTIRETY AND ETC,.

THIS

PETITION,

COMING

ON

FOR

PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This petition is filed impugning the order dated 01.06.2026, whereby the application filed under Order I Rule 10(2) of the CPC seeking to implead the petitioners as defendant Nos.10 and 11 has been dismissed. A perusal of the impugned order indicates that the dispute relates to the property bearing Survey No.42/2.

2.1 The said survey number is the subject matter of dispute in O.S.No.598/1999 as well as O.S.No.730/2008. The trial Court rejected the application on the ground that the proposed defendants are already parties to O.S.No.598/1999.

HC-KAR

2.2 When the very same property is the subject matter of dispute in O.S.No.598/1999 and the proposed defendants are found to be necessary parties, this Court finds no justification in rejecting the application seeking their impleadment as defendant Nos.10 and 11 in O.S.No.730/2008. The presence of defendant Nos.10 and 11 in O.S.No.730/2008 would, in fact, assist the Court in avoiding conflicting findings and would also afford them an opportunity to put forth their defence, thereby ensuring compliance with the principles of natural justice.

3. In that view, the following:

ORDER

i. The writ petition is allowed. ii. The order on I.A. dated 01.06.2026 in O.S.No.730/2008 pending on the file of IV Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District at Bengaluru, is set aside. iii. I.A. filed under Order I Rule 10(2) of CPC is allowed.

HC-KAR

iv. The petitioners herein are permitted to be impleaded as defendant Nos.10 and 11 in O.S.No.730/2008.

Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE

DDU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead