Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/6/2016 of STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs SRI H. PRABHUSWAMY on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010504582016 NC: 2026:KHC:52200 CRL.A No. 6 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 6 OF 2016 ( A -) BETWEEN: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE POLICE
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010504582016
NC: 2026:KHC:52200
CRL.A No. 6 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 6 OF 2016 (A-)
BETWEEN:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY
THE POLICE INSPECTOR
KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA,
MANDYA DISTRICT-571422.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VENKATESH S ARBATTI., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI H. PRABHUSWAMY
SON OF LATE SRI. SHANTHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
DEPUTY TAHSILDAR,
NADA KACHERI, BHARATHINAGAR
(K.M. DODDI), MADDUR TALUK-571422
MANDYA DISTRICT
RESIDENT OF
RAGIBOMMANAHALLI VILLAGE,
KIRUGAVALU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK - 571423.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SOMASHEKHAR KASHIMATH., ADVOCATE)
CRL.A. FILED U/S.378(1) & (3) CR.P.C R/W 27 OF P. C.
ACT BY THE SPL.P.P. FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING THAT THIS
HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO GRANT LEAVE TO FILE
THE APPEAL AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF
ACQUITTAL DATED 29.06.2015 IN SPL.C.NO.102/2011 BY THE
COURT OF PRL. DIST. AND S.J., MANDYA AND ETC.
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYAN N
Location: High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010504582016
NC: 2026:KHC:52200
CRL.A No. 6 of 2016
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the respondent has filed a memo that respondent/accused died about two years back.
Memo is placed on record.
In view of the memo, appeal is abated.
Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE
KBM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 75