Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/8145/2024 of SRI. SRINIVASA D Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010416182024 NC: 2026:KHC:52363 CRL.P No. 8145 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8145 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SRINIVASA D S/O DODDAPPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8145 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. SRINIVASA D
S/O DODDAPPAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
2.
SMT. VANITHA K
W/O RI SRINIVASA D,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
NO.60, 3RD CROSS,
BALAKRISHNAPPA LAYOUT,
M V EXTENSION, HOSAKOTE,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562114
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWARAPPA M.V, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
MALLESHWARAM P.S.
REPRESENTED BY THE
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU-560001
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
SRI DAYANAND PRABHU
S/O LATE N V PRABHU,
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS,
R/AT NO.202, JOHORE HOUSE,
18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM,
BENGALURU-560003
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE FIR FILED BY THE IST RESPONDENT IN
CR.NO/25/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE 32nd ACMM BENGALURU
CITY AND THE COMPLIANT FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
AS PER ANNEXURE A AND B.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
HC-KAR
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 18