Karnataka High Court
WP/18334/2022 of MR. S.K. SATYANARAYANA Vs CANARA BANK on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010421742022 NC: 2026:KHC:52025 WP No. 18334 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 18334 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. MR. S.K. SATYANARAYANA S/O SRI KUNTA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010421742022
NC: 2026:KHC:52025
WP No. 18334 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO. 18334 OF 2022 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
1.
MR. S.K. SATYANARAYANA
S/O SRI KUNTA SHETTY
AGED 52 YEARS
R/AT NO.4033, 26, 4TH CROSS,
3RD MAIN, B BLOCK, SUBRAMANYANAGAR
BENGALURU-560021.
2.
SMT PUNYAPRABHA V
W/O MR S K SATYANARAYANA
AGED 45 YEARS
R/AT NO.4033, 26, 4TH CROSS,
3RD MAIN, B BLOCK, SUBRAMANYANAGAR
BENGALURU-560021.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. SANDHYA U. PRABHU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
CANARA BANK
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORIZED OFFICER
SENIOR MANAGER
SRI V GAYATHRI DEVI
KEMPEGOWDANAGAR BRANCH,
NO.128/1A, APPU RAO ROAD,
KEMPEGOWDANAGAR, BENGALURU-560019.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. JAGADISH R. KUDRIGI, ADVOCATE)
Digitally Signed By:
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Verified
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010421742022
NC: 2026:KHC:52025
WP No. 18334 of 2022
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF
THE LEARNED CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU
RURAL
DISTRICT,
BENGALURU
IN
CRL.MISC.NO.37/2020
DATED 05.03.2020 IN RESPECT OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY
PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that this petition may be dismissed as withdrawn since the lis between the parties is amicably settled.
2. The said submission is taken on record.
3. In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19 Digitally Signed By: SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM Verified