Karnataka High Court
MFA/1582/2016 of SMT MUSHKARIYAMMA Vs SRI ABDUL PASHA on 22 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010223292016 NC: 2026:KHC:52316 MFA No. 1582 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1582 OF 2016 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT MUSHKARIYAMMA W/O LATE
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1582 OF 2016 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT MUSHKARIYAMMA
W/O LATE NAZEER
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
2.
SRI. JAHEED BASHA
S/O LATE NAZEER
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
3.
SRI. MEHABBOB PASHA
S/O LATE NAZEER
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
4.
SMT. HASINA TAJ
D/O LATE NAZEER
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
5.
SRI. AZAM PASHA
S/O LATE NAZEER
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
6.
SRI. YARAB PASHA
S/O LATE NAZEER
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
Digitally
signed by
VINUTHA M
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
7.
SRI. AKBAR PASHA
S/O LATE NAZEER
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
8.
SRI. SHAMSHID BASHA
S/O LATE NAZEER
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
9.
SRI HUSSAIN
S/O LATE ABDUL SATTAR SAB
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
10.
SMT. SHAMEEM TAJ
W/O LATE RAHEEM
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
11.
SRI. SALEEM PASHA
S/O LATE RAHEEM
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
12.
SMT. SAMEERA TAJ
D/O LATE RAHEEM
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
13.
SRI. MUHEED PASHA
S/O LATE RAHEEM
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
14.
SRI. TABREZ PASHA
S/O LATE RAHEEM
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
15.
SMT. UMER TAJ
D/O LATE RAHEEM
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
HC-KAR
16.
SRI. AHMED SAB
S/O LATE ABDUL SATTAR SAB
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
17.
SMT SABIRA
W/O LATE CHAND PASHA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
18.
SRI. UMRAZ
S/O LATE CHAND PASHA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
19.
SMT SABINA
D/O LATE CHAND PASHA
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
20.
SRI. AMEER
S/O LATE CHAND PASHA
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS
21.
SMT. SHAZAD
D/O LATE ABDUL SATTAR SAB
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
22.
SMT DILSHAD
D/O LATE ABDUL SATTAR SAB,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
23.
SMT GULAB JAN
D/O LATE ABDUL SATTAR SAB,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
24.
SMT SHAHTAJ
S/O LATE ABDUL SATTAR SAB,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
HC-KAR
25.
SRI ABDUL GANI
S/O LATE CHIKKASATTAR,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
26.
SMT CHOTIBI
D/O LATE CHIKKASATTAR,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
27.
SRI ASLAM PASHA
S/O LATE ABDUL SAB
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
28.
SRI AKRAM PASHA S/O LATE ABDUL SAB
SINCE DECEASED ON 04.09.2021, REP BY LRS
28A.
SMT. KUSHEED
W/O. AKRAM PASHA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
28B.
MEHABOOB PASHA
S/O. AKRAM PASHA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
28C.
KHALIL
S/O. AKRAM PASHA
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
R/AT NALAGALLI, HOSAKOTE
BANGALORE RURAL - 562 114
29.
SRI NISAR PASHA
S/O LATE ABDUL SAB
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
HC-KAR
30.
SRI SHAMSHID
S/O LATE ABDUL SAB
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
31.
SMT JABEEN TAJ
D/O LATE ABDUL SATTAR SAB
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
APPELLANTS NO.1 TO 31 ARE
R/AT NALAGALLI, HOSAKOTE TOWN
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT
BANGALORE - 562 122 AND THEY ARE REP.
BY THEIR G.P.A. HOLDERS I.E., APPELLANTS NO.32
AND 33
32.
SRI. HEMANTH KUMAR
S/O MYNE GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R/AT BHEEMAKANAHALLI,
HOSAKOTE TALUK,
BANGALORE - 562 122
33.
SRI GURUSWAMY
S/O LATE VENKATAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
R/AT NO.39, MANJUNATHA LAYOUT,
ANANDAPURA, T.C. PALYA POST,
K.R. PURAM, BANGALORE-560 036
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. C.S. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI ABDUL PASHA
S/O LATE BASHA,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
HC-KAR
2.
SRI MAHABOOB PASHA
S/O LATE BASHA,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
3.
SRI ALAM PASHA
S/O LATE BASHA,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
4.
SMT RASHEEDA BANU @ RASHEEDA
W/O LATE ANWAR,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
5.
SRI NAYEEM PASHA
S/O LATE ANWAR,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
6.
SRI NADEEM PASHA
S/O LATE ANWAR,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 6 ARE
R/AT AVALAHALLI VILLAGE,
NEAR JAMES SCHOOL, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK,
BANGALORE - 560 049
7.
SRI N SHIVAKUMAR
S/O NARAYANASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
R/AT SHIVA KRUPA,10TH CROSS,
CAUVERY LAYOUT, MARATHALLI,
BEHIND MULTIPLES THEATRE,
BANGALORE - 560 037
HC-KAR
8.
SRI NAGAMANJU
S/O NAGARAJU
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
R/AT THIRUMALASETTY HALLI,
HOSAKOTE TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT
BANGALORE - 562 122
9.
SRI RAVISAGARNAIDU
S/O NARASIAH,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
R/AT AVALAHALLI VILLAGE,
VIRGO NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE - 560 026
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. R. ANIL KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R3
SRI. BHADRINATH R., ADVOCATE FOR R2
SRI. T.N. VISHWANATH, ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R6
SRI. B.K. MANOHAR, ADVOCATE FOR R7 TO R9)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/O 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST
THE ORDER DATED 01.02.2015 PASSED ON IA NO.1 IN O.S
NO.1116/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, ALLOWING IA NO.1 FILED U/O 39 RULE 1 & 2 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
This appeal filed before this Court is not maintainable in view of Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964 and the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in Smt. Narayanamma -vs- The State of Karnataka in Writ Petition No.17588 of 2024 (GM-RES) c/w Writ Appeal No.200260 of 2025 (GM-RES) dated 8th July, 2026, which is affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP(c) No.025075/2026 dated 3.8.2026.
2. In view of the above, this Court deems it appropriate to transfer this matter to the concerned District Court for adjudication of the matter from the stage where it is stopped.
3. Accordingly, I pass the following:
HC-KAR
O R D E R
i) The appeal stands disposed of for statistical purposes. ii) Registry is directed to transfer the entire record of the case, to the concerned Principal District & Sessions Judge, who may assign it to the concerned Appellate Court having jurisdiction.
iii) In case there are pending applications, the same also be transferred to be considered by the learned Judge of the concerned Appellate Court, in accordance with law.
iv) It is made clear that this Court has not made any observation as to the merits of the case and all rights and contentions of the parties are left open to be agitated before the concerned Appellate Court.
HC-KAR
v) Learned counsel for appellants and learned counsel for the respondents are present. Hence, the parties shall appear before the learned District Judge on 26.10.2026 without awaiting further notice.
Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE
RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49