Karnataka High Court
WP/19473/2021 of JUSTICE INITIATIVE FOUNDATION Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010405902021 NC: 2026:KHC:51849-DB WP No. 19473 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA WRIT PETITION NO.19473 OF 2021 (GM-RES-PIL)
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA
WRIT PETITION NO.19473 OF 2021 (GM-RES-PIL)
BETWEEN:
JUSTICE INITIATIVE FOUNDATION
(CIN NO.U85320KA2020NPL141154)
A COMPANY ESTABLISHED U/S 7(2) AND 8(1) OF
THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
NO.24, CB-8
INDIAN SOCIAL INSTITUTE
BENSON ROAD, BENSON TOWN
BENGALURU-560046
REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
CECILIA DAVIES
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. G. SHARADA BAI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
Digitally
signed by
RAKSHA
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
HOME DEPARTMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BENGALURU 560001
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. BYREGOWDA N., AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTUION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DECLARING
CLAUSE I, SUB CLAUSES v, vi, vii, ix, x, AND xi OF THE
IMPUGNED GUIDELINES (ANNEXURE-A1) UNCONSTITUTIONAL
AND
VOID
TO
THE
EXTENT
THAT
THEY
PROHIBIT
CONSIDERATION OF THOSE CATEGORIES OF LIFE TERM
CONVICTS TO BE CONSIDERED FOR RELEASE FROM PRISON
UNDER ARTICLE 161 OF THE CONSTITUTION AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the petition and has filed a memo to that effect.
2. The memo is placed on record.
3. In view of the memo, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.P.VIVEKANANDA) JUDGE
RAK,List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29