Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/1111/2024 of K. SHANKARAPPA Vs DR. VIJAYA KUMAR on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010064172024 NC: 2026:KHC:51931 CRL.P No. 1111 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1111 OF 2024 BETWEEN: K. SHANKARAPPA S/O LATE KITTAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1111 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
K. SHANKARAPPA
S/O LATE KITTAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
R/O NO.31/1, SIRI COMPLEX,
7th CROSS, MUNESHWARA BLOCK,
KANTEERAVA STUDIO MAIN ROAD,
NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU 560096
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA L S.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
DR. VIJAYA KUMAR
S/O VIRUPAXAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
SKIN SPECIALIST AND COSTMETOLOGIST,
LAKSHMI COMPLEX, NO. 204, 50 FEET ROAD,
OPPOSITE NIRMALA STORE BUS STOP,
HANUMANTHANAGAR, BENGALURU 560019
ALSO AT:
DR. VIJAY KUMAR
S/O VIKRUPAXAPPA
AGED AOBUT 62 YEARS,
RESIDING AT 1768, 15th MAIN,
34th CROSS, BANASHAKARI II STAGE,
BENGALURU 560 070
…RESPONDENT
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 11.12.2023 PASSED BY THE LXV
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU
CITY (CCH-66) IN CRL.RP.NO.566/2023; B) SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 10.08.2023 ON MEMO FOR AMENDMENT OF
COMPLIANT DATED 03.01.2023 FILED IN C.C.NO.4184/2020
PASSED BY THE XVI ACMM AT BENGALURU AND DISMISS THE
MEMO AND THE MAIN COMPLIANT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for ninth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
HC-KAR
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4