Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/11396/2024 of SRI SHANKARA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010581232024 NC: 2026:KHC:51942 CRL.P No. 11396 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11396 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI SHANKARA AGE 40 YEARS, R/AT.NO.438, GPR LAYOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11396 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI SHANKARA
AGE 40 YEARS,
R/AT.NO.438, GPR LAYOUT
OLD CHANDPUR VILLAGE
ATTIBELE HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK
BENGALURU-754123
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANIKANTA H B.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY HCGP,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BANGALORE-560001
2.
SMT. SAHANA
W/O. SHANKAR,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
R/AT.NO.438, GPR LAYOUT
OLD CHANDPUR VILLAGE ATTIBELE HOBLI
ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU-754123
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P., HCGP FOR R1)
Digitally signed by
PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS)
PRAYING
TO
QUASH
THE
ENTIRE
CRIMINAL
PROCEEDINGS INITIATED AGAINST THE PETITIONERS IN CC
NO.99/2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF HONBLE PRINCIPAL
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT AT ANEKAL WHICH IS
REGISTERED IN PURSUANT TO FIR IN CRIME NO.267/2022
AND CHARGE SHEET DATED 01.12.2022, FOR THE OFFENCE
P/U/S 498A, 324 OF IPC AND SECTION 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY
PROHIBITION ACT AS PER ANNEXURE-A
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for third time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
HC-KAR
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 25