Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/10567/2024 of SRI. T S MANJUNATH Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010522162024 NC: 2026:KHC:51742 CRL.P No. 10567 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10567 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. T.S.MANJUNATH S/O LATE T.M.SAMPANGIRAMAIAH,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10567 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. T.S.MANJUNATH
S/O LATE T.M.SAMPANGIRAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
2.
SRI. T.S. NATARAJ,
S/O LATE T.M.SAMPANGIRAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
PETITIONERS 1 AND 2 ARE
R/AT THIRNAHALLI VILLAGE,
NANDI HOBLI,
MUDDENAHALLI POST,
CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK
AND DISTRICT.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. AKARSH KUMAR GOWDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP BY POLICE SUB INSPECTOR,
NANDI GIRIDAMA POLICE STATION,
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CHADALAPURA VILLAGE GATE,
CHIKKABALLAPUR 562 103.
2.
SRI S.GOPALAKRISHNA,
S/O SRINIVAS B.T.,
AGED MAJOR,
ADVOCATE
R/AT OPP: SHANIMAHATMA TEMPLE,
PRASHANTHNAGAR,
CHIKKABALLAPUR TOWN,
CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT 562 101.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.JAVEED S., HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS AS AGAINST
THE PETITIONERS IN CC NO.2241/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE II
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHIKKABALLAPURA FOR THE
ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 341, 447, 323, 324, 504, 506 R/W
34 OF IPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
It is submitted by the learned HCGP that petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 are acquitted for the offences they are charge sheeted before the Trial Court in C.C.No.2241/2021 vide judgment dated 23.11.2024. As such, petition does not survive for consideration.
Placing reliance on the above submission, petition is dismissed.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
GPG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 21