Karnataka High Court
WP/28104/2026 of M.B.SIDDESHA Vs SMT.BASAMMA on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010613452026 NC: 2026:KHC:51987 WP No. 28104 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 28104 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. M.B.SIDDESHA S/O MR. BASAVANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
WRIT PETITION NO. 28104 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
M.B.SIDDESHA
S/O MR. BASAVANTHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI SHIVAKUMARAPPA T. C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT.BASAMMA
W/O SHEKHARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST
2.
PUSHPA
W/O G VISHWANATH
D/O LATE BASAPPA
W/O LINGARAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
HOUSE WIFE
R/O NO.924/23, 1ST CROSS,
Digitally
signed by
VINUTHA B
S
Location:
High Court
of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
SHIVAKUMARSWAMY NAGARA
DAVANAGERE-577005.
3.
GURUSIDDAPPA
S/O LATE BASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
4.
SHIVAKUMAR
S/O LATE BASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
5.
SANTHOSH
S/O LATE GURUSIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
RESPONDENT No.3 TO 5 ARE
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING ORDER
PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
HOLALKERE IN R.A. NO. 25 OF 2021 ON I.A NO.2 AND I.A. NO.
3 DATED 02.06.2026, VIDE ANNEXURE H TO THE WRIT
PETITION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Heard Sri.Shivakumarappa T.C., learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The present writ petition impugns the order dated 02.06.2026, whereby the amendment sought by the plaintiff has been permitted.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amendment is without any basis.
4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. It is evident from the impugned order that the amendment sought was for correcting Survey No.19/4 as Survey No.99/4. The correction has been found necessary for adjudicating the dispute in the suit, having regard to the exhibits on record. The trial Court has further referred to the exhibits in paragraph No.6, wherein the property is referred to as Survey No.99/4, and all the revenue records pertaining to the said survey number also indicate the same. The amendment permitted is thus to bring the pleadings in
HC-KAR
conformity with the documentary evidence on record. No infirmity can be found in the impugned order. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33