Karnataka High Court
WP/34121/2013 of K R S ENTERPRISES Vs UNION OF INDIA on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010328042013 NC: 2026:KHC:51870 WP No. 34121 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 34121 OF 2013 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: K.R.S ENTERPRISES NO. 66/15, 1ST FLOOR,
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010328042013
NC: 2026:KHC:51870
WP No. 34121 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO. 34121 OF 2013 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
K.R.S ENTERPRISES
NO. 66/15, 1ST FLOOR, 1ST CROSS,
R.T. NAGAR POST, GANGANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 032.
(REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETARY)
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. A.V. AMARNATHAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
UNION OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS,
PARYAVARAN BHAWAN,
CGO COMPLEX, LODHIA ROAD,
NEW DELHI - 110 003
(REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY)
2.
STATE ENVIRONMENT IMPACT
ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY KARNATAKA,
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT,
M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
(REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY)
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.N. KUMAR, CGSC FOR R1;
SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R2;
SRI. VIKAS CHOPRA, ADVOCATE FOR R3 - QUALITY
COUNCIL OF INDIA)
Digitally signed
by
ANNAPURNA
G
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010328042013
NC: 2026:KHC:51870
WP No. 34121 of 2013
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
OFFICE MEMORANDUM DATED 2.12.2009 VIDE ANNEXURE-C
AND 18.3.2010 AS PER ANNEXURE-D ISSUED BY THE
RESPONDENT NO.1 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. The submission is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Pending applications, if any, are also disposed off.
Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
HDK