Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/989/2024 of FARHEEN NAAZ Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010057152024 NC: 2026:KHC:51930 CRL.P No. 989 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 989 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. FARHEEN NAAZ W/O MOHAMMED ISMAIL AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 989 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
FARHEEN NAAZ
W/O MOHAMMED ISMAIL
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS
R/O NO.1164, BTM LAYOUT,
1st STAGE, BANGALORE,
KARNATAKA 560076
2.
MOHAMMED ISMAIL
AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,
R/O NO.1164, BTM LAYOUT,
1st STAGE, BANGALORE
KARNATAKA 560076
3.
SALMAN
AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS,
R/AT BTM LAYOUT,
1ST STAGE, BANGALORE
KARNATAKA 560076
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SIRAJUDDIN AHMED.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY SHO,
SUDDAGUNTEPALYA P.S
BANGALORE
REP. BY SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560001
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
SRI. C .P NAJBUDHEEN
S/O MOHIDHEEN,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
R/O CHKKALAPARAMBIL
EDAKKULAM, TIRUNAVAYA
POST MALAPURAM,
KERALA 676 301
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED.S., HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASH
THE
ENTIRE
PROCEEDINGS
ARISING
OUT
FROM
THE
CR.NO.204/2023 OF SUDDAGUNTEPALYA P.S., PENDING ON
THE FILE OF III ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT
BANGALORE, AS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for ninth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
HC-KAR
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3