Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/4747/2024 of MR.RAMESH Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 21 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010258932024 NC: 2026:KHC:51936 CRL.P No. 4747 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4747 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. MR. RAMESH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O CHANDRA

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4747 OF 2024

BETWEEN:

1.

MR. RAMESH

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

S/O CHANDRA SHEKARA

RESIDING AT SARAWATHIPURAM,

EXTENSION, BAALEGADDE,

2.

MRS JYOTHI

AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,

W/O RAMESH,

RESIDING AT SARAWATHIPURAM,

EXTENSION, BAALEGADDE,

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. PRAKASH M PATIL.,ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

SAKALESHPURA TOWN POLICE STATION,

SAKALESHPURA TALUK,

HASSAN DISTRICT,

KARNATAKA - 573201.

REPRESENTED BY THE

STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Digitally signed

by PANKAJA S

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

ATTACHE TO THE HIGH COURT

AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,

BENGALORE - 560001.

KARNATAKA.

2.

MR LOKESH

S/O CHARMA SHETTY,

EXTENSION BAALEGADDE,

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. MAHESHA P., HCGP FOR R1)

CRL.P FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE

PROCEEDINGS IN S.C.NO.199/2018 PENDING BEFORE II

ADDITIONAL

JUDGE

AT

HASSAN

AND

QUASH

THE

PROCEEDINGS IN S.C. NO. 199/2018 PENDING BEFORE II

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT HASSAN.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.

2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in

HC-KAR

prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.

3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.

SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE

HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead