Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/957/2024 of SRI AMARNATH @ VECHAM AMARNATH Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010032752024 NC: 2026:KHC:51929 CRL.P No. 957 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 957 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI AMARNATH @ VECHAM AMARNATH S/O A V PADMANABHA
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 957 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI AMARNATH @ VECHAM AMARNATH
S/O A V PADMANABHA GUPTHA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
R/AT NO 7-110/48/A2
GUNJ ROAD ,NEAR BASAVESHWARA TEMPLE
S B H COLONY, GULBARGA
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NAGENDRA A V.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY INDIRANGARA TRAFFIC POLICE STATION
BENGALURU
REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSEUTOR
HIGH COURT COMPLEX
BENGALURU 560001
2.
SRI MUNIRAJU
S/O NARAYANAPPA
R/AT NO 285
POOJAMMA TEMPLE
NEAR SANTHOSH GEMY
SG PALYA, BENGALURU
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P., HCGP FOR R1)
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS ON THE FILE OF THE
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE I TRAFFIC COURT, MAYOHALL
BENGLAURU OF IN C.C.NO.48581/2019 (CR.NO.243/2016) FOR
FURTHER BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS
ON THE FILE OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE I TRAFFIC
COURT MAYHALL, BENGALURRU OF IN C.C. NO. 48581/2019
(CR.NO.
243/2016)
FOR
THE
ALLEGED
OFFENCE
P/U/S.279,304-A,304-II
OF
IPC
AND
SEC.134(A
AND
B),187,3(1),181,5(1),180,146,196
OF
INDIAN
MOTOR
VEHICLES ACT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
HC-KAR
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2