Karnataka High Court

WP/23256/2026 of THE KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY, Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, on 21 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010518852026 NC: 2026:KHC:52010-DB WP No. 23256 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 23256 OF 2026 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN:

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT

AND

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

WRIT PETITION NO. 23256 OF 2026 (S-KSAT)

BETWEEN:

THE KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY,

BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,

MALLESHWARAM 18TH CROSS,

BENGALURU-560 012.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. RAMESH N.K., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,

REPRESENTED BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,

M.S.BUILDING,

BENGALURU-560 001.

2.

SMT. SUNITA HEGADE,

W/O. LAXMAN D KOPPAD,

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

WORKING AS SENIOR ASSISTANTK-4,

SUB-DIVISION,

BESCOM, KENGERI,

R/A. NO.248/A,

ACHUTH GRAND APARTMENTS,

PAPAREDDY PALYA,

VIDHANA SOUDHA LAYOUT,

Digitally signed

by AASEEFA

PARVEEN

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

NAGARBHAVI,

BENGALURU - 560 072

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. VIKAS ROJIPURA, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. V.R. SARATHY, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR

RECORDS RELATING TO THE PASSING OF THE ORDER DATED

22.07.2026 PASSED IN APPLICATION No.3212/2026 AS PER

(ANNEXURE-A) ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE KARNATAKA

STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU AND ETC.

THIS

PETITION,

COMING

ON

FOR

PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT

and

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) Sri.Ramesh.N.K., learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the writ petition is against the impugned order passed by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru in Application No.3212/2026. However, he further submits that during the pendency of this writ petition, the main application(Application No.3212/2026) is disposed of by the Tribunal.

HC-KAR

2. Memo filed in that regard is taken on record.

3. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE DS CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead