Karnataka High Court
WP/22218/2026 of M/S. ANGELIC INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010490552026 NC: 2026:KHC:51962 WP No. 22218 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 22218 OF 2026 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. M/S. ANGELIC INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED ( A
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
WRIT PETITION NO. 22218 OF 2026 (GM-POLICE)
BETWEEN:
1.
M/S. ANGELIC INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED
(A COMPANY REGISTERED
UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013)
HAVING ITS REGISTERED
OFFICE AT PLOT NO. C 26D,
RIICO INDUSTRIAL AREA,
MALVIYA NAGAR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN,
INDIA-302 017,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, SRI. VIKALP
MAHESHWARI
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. BHARATH KUMAR V.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH ITS SECRETARY,
HOME DEPARTMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE 560001
2.
CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY THE POLICE INSPECTOR,
BENGALURU CITY, INFANTRY ROAD,
COMMISSIONER OFFICE,.
HC-KAR
BENGALURU-560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. DEVARAJ C H., GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R1 &
R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR
DIRECTION, QUASHING THE NOTICE DATED 22.06.2026
ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2-POLICE UNDER SECTION
35 (3) OF THE BHARATHIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA IN
CRIME NO.37/2026 REGISTERRED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 - POLICE VIDE ANNEUXRE -A SUCH MAY BE DONE IN THE BEST
INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner submits that consequent to filing of the present wit petition, that lien has been marked up to a sum of Rs.10,000/- and the petitioner has been permitted to operate his bank account. In view of the same, no further orders are required to be passed against the petitioner.
2. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Digitally Signed by CHEPPUDIRA MONNAPPA POONACHA
HC-KAR
3. This order will not preclude the petitioner from availing other remedies as permissible under law.
4. Pending IAs.,if any, also stand disposed of.
(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
Vmb List No.: 2 Sl No.: 59
Digitally Signed by CHEPPUDIRA MONNAPPA POONACHA