Karnataka High Court
WP/17032/2023 of MR. GIRISH SHIVANI THIMMANNA Vs UNION OF INDIA on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010399072023 NC: 2026:KHC:51867 WP No. 17032 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 17032 OF 2023 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: MR. GIRISH SHIVANI THIMMANNA S/O.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO. 17032 OF 2023 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
MR. GIRISH SHIVANI THIMMANNA
S/O. THIMANNA KESHAVATH BALAHANUMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 272, 6TH CROSS,
BHEL EXTENSION, BHEL PARK,
PATTANAGERE, BANGALORE SOUTH,
KARNATAKA - 560 098,
REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER,
MR. BHASKAR S.T ,
S/O. MR. THIMMANNA K. B.,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 272, 6TH CROSS,
BHEL EXTENSION,
BHEL PARK, PATTANAGERE,
BANGALORE SOUTH,
KARNATAKA - 560 098.
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. PRIYA V.B. SHETTAR, ADVOCATE
SRI. MURUGESH RAMAIAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
UNION OF INDIA
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,
MINISTRY OF FINANCE,
NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001.
Digitally signed
by
ANNAPURNA
G
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
2.
THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,
NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001.
3.
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
ESTABLISHED UNDER THE RESERVE
BANK OF INDIA ACT,
HAVING ONE OF ITS OFFICES AT
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.
REP. BY ITS REGIONAL/ZONAL MANAGER.
4.
NATIONAL HOUSING BANK
CRORE 5-A, INDIA HABITAT CENTER,
3RD AND 5TH FLOOR, LODHI ROAD,
NEW DELHI - 110 003,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
5.
TRANS UNION CIBIL LIMITED
INCORPORATED BASED ON RBI RECOMMENDATION
(FORMERLY CREDIT INFORMATION
BUREAU (INDIA) LTD,)
ONE INDIA BULLS CENTER,
TOWER 2A, 19TH FLOOR,
SENAPATHI BAPATM MARG,
ELPHINSTONE ROAD, MUMBAI - 400 013,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
6.
STATE BANK OF INDIA
R.A.C.P.C., KORAMANGALA NO. 12,
3RD FLOOR, 7TH MAIN,
3RD BLOCK, KORAMANGALA,
BENGALURU - 560 034,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
HC-KAR
7.
MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
INCORPORATED UNDER COMAPNIES ACT, 1956
MANTRI HOUSE, NO.41, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
8.
JASMINE ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED
INCORPORATED UNDER COMAPNIES ACT, 1956
MANTRI HOUSE, NO.41, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
9.
SMARTHOMES DEVELOPERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., INCORPORATED UNDER COMAPNIES ACT, 1956
MANTRI HOUSE,
NO.41, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
10.
THE MANTRI ESPANA RESIDENTIAL
APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION
INCORPORATED UNDER THE
KARNATAKA APARTMENT OWNERSHIP ACT
KARIYAMMANA AGRAHARA,
DEVARABISANAHALLI VILLAGE,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. MADHAVI R, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SMT. B. SKANYA BALGA, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. WADIA G. HANDY, ADVOCATE FOR R5; SRI. JAITHRA J. NARAYAN, ADVOCATE FOR R7 AND R8; R9 - SMARTHOMES DEVELOPERS (INDIA) PVT, LTD., SERVED; SRI. G. VIKRAM, ADVOCATE FOR R10)
HC-KAR
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO RESTRAIN THE R6, STATE BANK OF INDIA FROM TAKING ANY COERCIVE ACTION
AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND THE PETITIONERS FAMILY FOR
RECOVERING ANY AMOUNT COMPRISED IN THE DEMAND
NOTICE DTD 15.07.2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the writ petition. In the memo, it is stated that there is already settlement and therefore the petitioner does not wish to prosecute the caption petition.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. In terms of memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16