Karnataka High Court

WP/17032/2023 of MR. GIRISH SHIVANI THIMMANNA Vs UNION OF INDIA on 21 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010399072023 NC: 2026:KHC:51867 WP No. 17032 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 17032 OF 2023 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: MR. GIRISH SHIVANI THIMMANNA S/O.

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

WRIT PETITION NO. 17032 OF 2023 (GM-DRT)

BETWEEN:

MR. GIRISH SHIVANI THIMMANNA

S/O. THIMANNA KESHAVATH BALAHANUMAIAH,

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

R/AT NO. 272, 6TH CROSS,

BHEL EXTENSION, BHEL PARK,

PATTANAGERE, BANGALORE SOUTH,

KARNATAKA - 560 098,

REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER,

MR. BHASKAR S.T ,

S/O. MR. THIMMANNA K. B.,

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

R/AT NO. 272, 6TH CROSS,

BHEL EXTENSION,

BHEL PARK, PATTANAGERE,

BANGALORE SOUTH,

KARNATAKA - 560 098.

…PETITIONER

(BY SMT. PRIYA V.B. SHETTAR, ADVOCATE

SRI. MURUGESH RAMAIAH, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

UNION OF INDIA

REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,

MINISTRY OF FINANCE,

NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001.

Digitally signed

by

ANNAPURNA

G

Location: High

Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

2.

THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,

REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,

NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001.

3.

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

ESTABLISHED UNDER THE RESERVE

BANK OF INDIA ACT,

HAVING ONE OF ITS OFFICES AT

NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.

REP. BY ITS REGIONAL/ZONAL MANAGER.

4.

NATIONAL HOUSING BANK

CRORE 5-A, INDIA HABITAT CENTER,

3RD AND 5TH FLOOR, LODHI ROAD,

NEW DELHI - 110 003,

REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

5.

TRANS UNION CIBIL LIMITED

INCORPORATED BASED ON RBI RECOMMENDATION

(FORMERLY CREDIT INFORMATION

BUREAU (INDIA) LTD,)

ONE INDIA BULLS CENTER,

TOWER 2A, 19TH FLOOR,

SENAPATHI BAPATM MARG,

ELPHINSTONE ROAD, MUMBAI - 400 013,

REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

6.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

R.A.C.P.C., KORAMANGALA NO. 12,

3RD FLOOR, 7TH MAIN,

3RD BLOCK, KORAMANGALA,

BENGALURU - 560 034,

REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

HC-KAR

7.

MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED

INCORPORATED UNDER COMAPNIES ACT, 1956

MANTRI HOUSE, NO.41, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.

REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

8.

JASMINE ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED

INCORPORATED UNDER COMAPNIES ACT, 1956

MANTRI HOUSE, NO.41, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.

REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

9.

SMARTHOMES DEVELOPERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., INCORPORATED UNDER COMAPNIES ACT, 1956

MANTRI HOUSE,

NO.41, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD,

BANGALORE - 560 001.

REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

10.

THE MANTRI ESPANA RESIDENTIAL

APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION

INCORPORATED UNDER THE

KARNATAKA APARTMENT OWNERSHIP ACT

KARIYAMMANA AGRAHARA,

DEVARABISANAHALLI VILLAGE,

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT. MADHAVI R, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SMT. B. SKANYA BALGA, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. WADIA G. HANDY, ADVOCATE FOR R5; SRI. JAITHRA J. NARAYAN, ADVOCATE FOR R7 AND R8; R9 - SMARTHOMES DEVELOPERS (INDIA) PVT, LTD., SERVED; SRI. G. VIKRAM, ADVOCATE FOR R10)

HC-KAR

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO RESTRAIN THE R6, STATE BANK OF INDIA FROM TAKING ANY COERCIVE ACTION

AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND THE PETITIONERS FAMILY FOR

RECOVERING ANY AMOUNT COMPRISED IN THE DEMAND

NOTICE DTD 15.07.2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the writ petition. In the memo, it is stated that there is already settlement and therefore the petitioner does not wish to prosecute the caption petition.

2. The memo is taken on record.

3. In terms of memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE

HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead