Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/14104/2024 of SMT.CHANDRIKA Vs SMT. SEETHALAKSHMI on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010690132024 NC: 2026:KHC:51944 CRL.P No. 14104 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14104 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SMT.CHANDRIKA W/O SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010690132024
NC: 2026:KHC:51944
CRL.P No. 14104 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14104 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SMT.CHANDRIKA
W/O SHIVAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R/AT: NO.592, 53
SRI SHIVAGANGA TEMPLE GREEN APARTMENT
NEAR VASANTHAPURA,
BANGALORE 560061
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. C V SRINIVASA.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. SEETHALAKSHMI
D/O LATE SUBBARAO
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
R/AT OPP RAMAMANDIRA
FORT KANAKAPURA TOWN
AND TALUK.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CC
NO. 1958/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE PRL. CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC AT KANAKAPURA ARISING OUT OF THE
COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT IN PCR NO.160/2021
FOR OFFENCES WHICH ARE MADE PENAL UNDER SECTION 138
OF NI ACT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010690132024
NC: 2026:KHC:51944
CRL.P No. 14104 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for seventh time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 29