Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/4695/2024 of C. V. KUNDA NANDANA REDDY Vs NARASIMHA REDDY on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010223802024 NC: 2026:KHC:51935 CRL.P No. 4695 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4695 OF 2024 BETWEEN: C. V. KUNDA NANDANA REDDY S/O LATE C VENKATAREDDY,
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010223802024
NC: 2026:KHC:51935
CRL.P No. 4695 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4695 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
C. V. KUNDA NANDANA REDDY
S/O LATE C VENKATAREDDY,
GED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
R/AT FLAT NO.101
S.L.V SHRESTA RESIDENCY,
KRISHNA NORTH VILLAS,
2ND CROSS, RAMACHANDRAPURA,
BANGALORE-13.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. T.A RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
NARASIMHA REDDY
S/O LATE SUBBANNA,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
RES. AT VYCHAKURAHALLI VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBALI, RAMAPUR POST,
GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK,
CHIKKABALAPURA DISTRICT,
PIN-562132.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO
QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.1746/2021 ORIGINATED
FROM PCR NO.32/2021 OF FILED BY THE RESPONDENT, FOR
OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT, WHICH IS PENDING ON THE
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010223802024
NC: 2026:KHC:51935
CRL.P No. 4695 of 2024
FILE
OF
PRL.
CIVIL
JUDGE
(JR.DN.)
AND
JMFC
AT
GAURIBIDANUR, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/-
(RAJESH RAI K)
JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11