Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/1565/2024 of SMT C SASIKALA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010090942024 NC: 2026:KHC:51932 CRL.P No. 1565 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1565 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SMT C SASIKALA W/O SUBRAMANI B AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010090942024
NC: 2026:KHC:51932
CRL.P No. 1565 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1565 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SMT C SASIKALA
W/O SUBRAMANI B
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO. 2/2,
SRIRASMA NILAYA,
ST BHOOMAIAH LAYOUT,
DIESEL SHED ROAD, K R PURAM
BENGALURU 560043
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ANANDA V.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH THE K R PURAM POLICE
BANGALORE CITY
REPRSENTED BY THE
STATE PUBLIC PROECUTOR
HIGH COURT COMPLEX
BANGALORE 560001
2.
SHASHIDHAR G
S/O DR G RAJESHYAM
R/AT NO 68/D1, COMFORT
GARDENIA, FLAT NO 203,
JOGUPALYA MAIN ROAD,
HALASURU, BENGALURU 560008
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P.,HCGP FOR R1)
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010090942024
NC: 2026:KHC:51932
CRL.P No. 1565 of 2024
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASH
THE REGISTRATION OF FIR IN CR.NO.875/2023 AT ANNEXURE- A PENDING BEFORE III ADDL.C.M.M COURT MAYO HALL
BENGALURU CITY P/U/S 406,420,465,467,468 R/W 34 OF IPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for eleventh time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K