Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/10523/2024 of ARTI DAYAL Vs THE STATE BY MAHADEVAPURAM POLICE STATION on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010526292024 NC: 2026:KHC:51939 CRL.P No. 10523 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10523 OF 2024 BETWEEN: ARTI DAYAL W/O PANKAJ DAYAL, AGE 30 YEARS, R/O
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10523 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
ARTI DAYAL
W/O PANKAJ DAYAL,
AGE 30 YEARS,
R/O H.NO. 112, SAGAR LAND MARK AYODHUA
BYPASS, BHOPAL MADHYA PRADESH
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JAYANTHI R, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE STATE
BY MAHADEVAPURAM POLICE STATION
BENGALURU
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AT BENGALURU-560 001
2.
ANIL REDDY
S/O VASHU P
R/O 8 44 8, F1, SUKUM NIVASV, VIDYA NAGAR
CHINWALITAIR COLONY, OLD CBI ROAD
VISSHAKAPATNAM
ANDHRA PRADESH-530 017
M.B 8886914727
3.
VENKATESH SAI
R/O BENGALURU CITY,
KARNATAKA, M.B 9959191748
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
4.
NARAYAN POLIWALL
R/O BENGALURU CITY,
KARNATAKA,
M.B 9959191748
5.
DOTOR MOHIT
R/O BENGALURU CITY,
KARNATAKA,
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS)
PRAYING
TO
TRANSFER
THE
INVESTIGATION
IN
FIR
NO.602/2023 DTD 01.10.2023 U/S 344,376,504,506 R/W 34
OF IPC, SEC 3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(1)(w)(i),3(2)(v) OF SC/ST (POA)
ACT OF POLICE STATION MAHADEVAPURAM, FROM THE LOCAL
MAHADEVAPURAM
POLICE
TO
CENTRAL
BUREAU
OF
INVESTIGATION
(CBI)
FOR
THOROUGH
AND
DETAILED
INVESTIGATION AND OR PROSECUTION OF THE ACCUSED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for ninth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the
HC-KAR
petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 20