Karnataka High Court
CCC/1373/2025 of SRI GOWDESH L N Vs SRI R N DIXIT on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010694772025 NC: 2026:KHC:51642-DB CCC No. 1373 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1373 OF 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1373 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI GOWDESH L.N
S/O CHIKKA MOTAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
2.
SRI UMASHANKAR L. N,
S/O NARAYANAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
3.
SRI D M VENKETESH,
S/O MUNEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS,
4.
SRI VEERABHADRAYYA B,
S/O BASETTAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS,
5.
SRI RAVIKUMAR L. S,
S/O SUBBANNA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
COMPLAINANT NOS.1 TO 5 ARE
R/AT: DEVANAGUNDI, HOSAKOTE TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL, KARNATAKA – 560 067.
6.
SMT. L. P. PREMA
W/O H N KEMPAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/AT NEAR GOVT. SCHOOL,
Digitally
signed by K G
RENUKAMBA
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
DEVANAGUNDI HOSAHALLI,
BANGALORE RURAL KARANATAKA-560 067.
7.
SMT. PRAMILAMMA
W/O CHINNASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
R/AT #113, DEVANAGUNDI,
BANGALORE RURAL KARANATAKA-560 067.
8.
SRI S KRISHNAPPA,
S/O SIMPANNA,
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
R/AT #155 DEVANAGUNDI,
BANGALORE RURAL KARANATAKA-560 067.
9.
SRI.N NANJUNDAPPA,
S/O NANJAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS,
R/AT NO 371, 11TH CROSS,
20TH MAIN, JP NAGAR,
2ND PHASE, BANGALORE SOUTH,
JP NAGAR, DIST: BENGALURU,
KARNATAKA – 560 078.
10.
SRI. RAMANJI GOWDA,
S/O HANUMANTHE GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
R/AT NO.326, 15TH CROSS,
NEAR SADASHIVANAGAR CLUB,
BANGALORE-560 080.
11.
SRI NAGARAJ H.N,
S/O ANJANAPPA.P,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
R/AT: #B-817, 5TH CROSS,
2ND MAIN, BAHUBALINAGAR,
BANGALORE NORTH-560 013.
12.
SRI.H.A.DEVARAJ,
S/O P.ANJINAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
R/AT: HONACHANAHALLI,
KOTTEGENAHALLI VILLAGE, HOSKOTE TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL-562 114.
HC-KAR
13.
SRI YAKUB SABI
S/O SHEK MADHAV SUB,
AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS,
R/AT #VAGATA AGRAHARA VILLAGE,
HOSKOTE TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL-562 114.
14.
SRI KRISHNAPPA V.M
S/O MUNIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
R/AT #VAGATA AGRAHARA VILLAGE,
HOSKOTE TALUK,
BANGALURU RURAL-562 114.
15.
SRI. V.N.RAVINDRA,
S/O LATE.V.C.NAGARAJA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
NO.18, IOC ROAD,
VAGATA AGARAHARA
HOSKOTE TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRCT-562 114.
16.
SRI. MUNIYAPPA
S/O VENKATAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
17.
SRI. V.A.VARADARAJA
S/O ANJINAPPA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
18.
SRI.V.A.MANJUNATHA,
S/O ANJINAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
19.
SRI.SRINIVASA,
S/O K.M.ANJINAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
20.
SRI.M.BAYTARAYAPPA,
S/O MUNISWAMPPA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
HC-KAR
21.
SRI. MUNIYAPPA,
S/O MUNISHAMPPA,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
COMPLAINANT NOS.16 TO 21 ARE R/AT:
CHANDHRAPURA VILLAGE,
JADAGENAHALLI HOBLI,
BENGALURU RURAL-560 053.
22.
SMT. MANJULAMMA,
W/O KRISHNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
23.
SRI.MANJUNATHA.C,
S/O CHIKKA NARAYANAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
24.
SRI. MUKAUNDAPPA,
S/O ANJINAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
25.
SRI.P.MANAMOHAN,
S/O PILLAREDDY,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
COMPLAINANT NOS.22 TO 25 ARE R/AT:
GOVINDAPURA VILLAGE,
HOSKOTE TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL-562 114.
26.
SRI.NARAYANASWAMY,
S/O MUNIMUTTAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
27.
SRI.V.PRAVEEN,
S/O VASUDEVAREDDY,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
COMPLAINANT NOS.26 AND 27 ARE R/AT:
PARAMANAHALLI VILLAGE,
HOSKOTE TALUK,
BENGALURU-562 114.
HC-KAR
28.
SMT. JAYALAKSHMAMMA
W/O NARAYANAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
R/AT GOVINDHAPURA VILLAGE,
HOSKOTE TALUK,
BENGALURU-562 114.
29.
SRI. P.MANAMOHAN
S/O CHIKKAPILLAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
R/AT GOVINDHAPURA,
HOSKOTE TALUK,
BENGALURU-562 114.
30.
SRI. LAKSHMINARAYANA
S/O LATE.KEMPAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
R/AT HONACHANNAHALLI VILLAGE,
HOSKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU-562 114.
31.
SRI. SARAGIPANI,
S/O CHANDHARASHEKAR,
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,
R/O VAGATA AGARAHARA VILLAGE,
HOSKOTE TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRCT-562 114.
32.
SRI. VARADARAJU
S/O NARAYANAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
R/AT CHANDHRAPURA VILLAGE,
JADAGENAHALLI HOBLI,
BENGALURU RURAL-560 053.
…COMPLAINANTS
(BY SMT.SUKANYA.H.D., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI R.N.DIXIT,
UNDERSECRETARY,
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,
MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT
AND HIGHWAYS,
TRANSPORT BHAVAN NO.1,
HC-KAR
PARLIAMENT STREET,
NEW DEHLI-110 001.
2.
SRI.JAYAKUMAR,
THE GENERAL MANGER (TECH)
AND PROJECT DIRECTOR,
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA 207, SY.NO.13, 14TH KM, NAGASANDRA, BANGALORE -560 073.
3.
SRI. MALLIKARJUN,
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION
OFFICER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY,
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ,
207, NO.618/3, NEERABHAVI KEMPANNA,
BADAVANE HEBBAL,
BANGALORE-560 024.
…ACCUSED
(BY SMT.SHILPA GHANSHYAMBHAI SHAH.,
ADVOCATE FOR A1 TO A3)
THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS
11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE
215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED HEREIN, WHO HAVE
COMMITTED CONTEMPT OF CURT BY DISOBEYING THE ORDER
PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.30740/2024(GM-RES)
DATED 29.11.2024 PRODUCED HEREWITH AS ANNEXURE-E.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
and
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
Learned counsel for accused No.2 has filed an affidavit tendering apology. The affidavit is taken on record.
2. This contempt petition is filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.30748/2024 c/w Writ Petition No.30740/2024 dated 29.11.2024. By an order, a learned Single Judge of this Court disposed of the aforesaid two writ petitions with the following observation:
"3. Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of, directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 27.09.2024 submitted by the petitioners in W.P.No.30748/2024 (Annexure-E) and the representation dated 12.09.2024 submitted by the petitioners in W.P.No.30740/2024 (Annexure-H), and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order, if not already considered."
3. In the affidavit filed on behalf of accused No.2 on 05.03.2026, in paragraph No.4, has stated as follows:
"4. I state that our office, by letter bearing No.NHAI/PIU-BNG/LA/2025-26/1541 dated 15th September 2025 communicated to the Petitioners in W.P. 16178/2024 which petition was filed seeking
HC-KAR
identical relief as in W.P.No.30748/2024 and W.P. No.30740/2024 and order passed on same line as in said two Writ petitions, stating therein that sufficient facilities have been provided in the project stretch as much as service road has been provided for various lengths of the Project stretch depending upon the site conditions and that five numbers of underpass structure also has been provided for the village roads. Subsequently, upon realizing that though Sri Ramanji Gowda (Complainant No.10 herein), one of the petitioners was common in W.P. 16178/2024 which petition was filed seeking identical relief as in W.P. No.30740/2024 said communication was not sent to all the petitioners of the said two petitions, our office issued a letter bearing No.NHAI/PIU- BNG/LA/2025-26/2696 dated 13th January 2026 (hereinafter referred to as "Endorsement") to each of the Complainants in the present case in compliance of the order dated 29th November 2024 of the Hon'ble Single Judge. It was informed to the Complainants that sufficient facilities have already been provided in view of the provision of underpass structures in the stretches from Dommalur Village to Chandrapura Cross and providing of service roads for various lengths of the Project stretch depending upon the site conditions. Copy of the letter dated 15th September 2025 was also enclosed along with the endorsement. A copy of the Endorsement along with the enclosed letter dated 15th September 2025 are produced as Annexure R1."
4. We have perused the endorsement passed. The endorsement also mentions another Writ Petition No.16178/2024 and an order of this Court passed therein on 05.07.2024. It is evident that the aforesaid order of the writ Court has been complied with. Tracking report of the endorsements sent to the accused are also enclosed evincing
HC-KAR
communication of the endorsement, which was delivered in January / February, 2026.
5. In the additional affidavit, accused No.2 has tendered an unconditional apology, which is accepted. In view of the aforesaid, this contempt petition is consigned.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE
KG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1