Karnataka High Court
RPFC/110/2024 of SMT. VANI RAJESH Vs RAJESH. H. G. on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010283692024 NC: 2026:KHC:51671 RPFC No. 110 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 110 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. VANI RAJESH W/O RAJESH H.G., AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 110 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. VANI RAJESH
W/O RAJESH H.G.,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
2.
MISS. KASHVI,
D/O RAJESH H G.,
AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,
3.
MISS SHYVI,
D/O RAJESH H G.,
AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS,
PETITIONER NO.3 IS MINOR
REP BY HER MOTHER,
NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER
SMT. VANI RAJESH,
ALL ARE R/O NEAR
GOOD MORNING SHOP,
SINGARI NILAYA ROAD,
GOWRI KALUVE,
CHIKKAMAGALURU CITY – 577 101
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. GIRISH B BALADARE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
RAJESH H.G.
S/O H.D. GIDDE GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
Digitally signed
by SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
R/O NEAR MORNING SHOP,
SINGARI NILAYA ROAD,
GOWRI KALUVE,
CHIKKAMAGALURU CITY – 577 101
PRESENTLY R/O AT NEAR
CATHOLIC CLUB,
UNDEDASARAHALLI,
CHIKKAMAGALURU CITY – 577 101.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K.S.GANESHA, ADVOCATE)
THIS RPFC FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF FAMILY COURTS
ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 1.10.2022 PASSED IN
CRL.MISC NO.102/2021 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY
COURT,
CHIKKAMAGALURU,
DISMISSING
THE
PETITION
FILED
UNDER
SEC.125
OF
Cr.P.C.,
FOR
MAINTENANCE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the matter is settled between the parties out of the Court and that they intend to withdraw the petition.
2. The memo is taken on record.
HC-KAR
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
PKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 20