Karnataka High Court
WP/15008/2022 of SMT G P MANGALA ARUN Vs THE MANAGER on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010340222022 NC: 2026:KHC:51854 WP No. 15008 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 15008 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SMT. G.P. MANGALA ARUN W/O SRI. ARUN
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO. 15008 OF 2022 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
SMT. G.P. MANGALA ARUN
W/O SRI. ARUN KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
NO. 2610, 1ST FLOOR, 26TH MAIN
38TH B CROSS, 9TH BLOCK
JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 016.
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO. 740
22ND MAIN, J.P. NAGAR 2ND PHASE
BENGALURU - 560 078.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRASHANTH H.S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE MANAGER
THE BHAVASARA KSHATRIYA
CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,
SAHAKAR SADAN, NO 63/67,
24TH CROSS, KILARI ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 051,
REP. BY AUTHORISED OFFICER
IT IS REGISTERED UNDER
COMPANIES ACT OF 2013.
2.
SMT. S.V. SANDHYA
W/O LATE N. SRIKANTH
Digitally signed
by
ANNAPURNA
G
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
NO. 139/A, 38TH B CROSS
26TH MAIN, JAYANAGAR 9TH BLOCK
BENGALURU - 560 069.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SAILESH S. KATAREY, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. VIGNESHA B.S, ADVOCATE FOR PROPOSED
RESPONDENT
R2 - S.V. SANDHYA - SERVED)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
PUBLIC NOTICE DATED 20.06.2022 ISSUED BY THE R1 FIXING
THE DATE FOR PUBLIC AUCTION OF THE SCHEDULE A
PROPERTY ON 29.07.2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-K ISSUED BY THE
R1 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 09.09.2026, seeking withdrawal of the writ petition. The memo indicates that the entire amount due is discharged by the petitioner/borrower.
HC-KAR
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- bank on instructions submits that the amount deposited before this Court may be refunded back to the petitioner
3. The memo is taken on record.
4. In view of the said memo, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Recording the statement of the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-bank, the Registry is directed to release the amount to the petitioner with accrued interest subject to proper identification. Pending applications, if any, are also disposed off.
Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3