Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/9512/2024 of WAHID FYZH KHAN Vs STATE BY WOMEN POLICE STATION on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010512602024 NC: 2026:KHC:51938 CRL.P No. 9512 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9512 OF 2024 BETWEEN: WAHID FYZH KHAN S/O KABEER AHMED KHAN AGED ABOUT 48
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010512602024
NC: 2026:KHC:51938
CRL.P No. 9512 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9512 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
WAHID FYZH KHAN
S/O KABEER AHMED KHAN
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
R/AT NO.19, PALM DE HOODS
7TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN,
KULLAPPA CIRCLE, KAMANAHALLI
BENGALURU, KARNATAKA
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ZUBAIDA A, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
STATE BY WOMEN POLICE STATION
(BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
MYSURU DISTRICT)
KARNATAKA
2.
SANIYA AZMI
W/O WAHID FYZH KHAN
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
R/AT NO.5, BUILDING NO.8,
BEHIND VTU COLLEGE SATHAGALLI
BENGALURU, MYSURU DIST
KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR NO.13/2024 DATED
06.02.2024
REGISTERED
AT
WOMEN
P.S.
U/S
498(A),504,506,323 R/W 34 OF IPC AND SEC.3,4 OF D.P ACT
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010512602024
NC: 2026:KHC:51938
CRL.P No. 9512 of 2024
CONVERTED IN TO C.C.NO.4430/2024 IS PENDING IN THE XIII
ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AT MYSORE DISTRICT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 18