Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/10782/2024 of SMT SHAWANA TASNEEM Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010526572024 NC: 2026:KHC:51940 CRL.P No. 10782 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10782 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT SHAWANA TASNEEM WIFE OF ABDUAL RAHAMAN AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10782 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT SHAWANA TASNEEM
WIFE OF ABDUAL RAHAMAN
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
SHANTHINAGAR, KOLAR 563101
2.
SRI ABRAR AHMED
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
SHANTHINAGAR, KOLAR 563101
3.
SRI IRFAN
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
RESIDING AT FRAZER TOWN
BANGALORE 560 005
4.
SRI UMME KHAIR
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS
RESIDING AT FRAZER TOWN
BANGALORE 560 005
5.
SRI. MAAZ AHMED
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
RESIDING AT FRAZERT TOWN
BANGALORE 560 005
6.
SRI MOHIYUDDIN
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
RESIDING AT FRAZERT TOWN
BANGALORE 560 005
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SUNIL T..,ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP BY TILAKNAGAR POLICE
BANGALORE 560 041
2.
SMT. FATIMA KOUSER
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO. 01
6TH FLOOR, 1ST B CROSS
BHEL LAYOUT
SRK GARDEN TILAKNAGAR
BANGALORE 560 041
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P., HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS)
PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR OF CR.NO.183/2024 DATED
26.08.2024 FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 115(2),126(2),190, 329(3),351(2),352,342 OF BNSS (323,448,487,504 OF IPC
RESPECTIVELY) MARKED AS ANNEXURE-B, PENDING ON THE
FILE OF CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in
HC-KAR
prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 23