Karnataka High Court
WP/16229/2022 of M/S BANASHANKARI AGENCIES Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010365602022 NC: 2026:KHC:51856 WP No. 16229 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 16229 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: M/S. BANASHANKARI AGENCIES, REPRESENTED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO. 16229 OF 2022 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
M/S. BANASHANKARI AGENCIES,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETRIX,
SMT.LAXMANNA N.T.,
W/O LATE SRI. RANGA SHETTY,
AGED 67 YEARS,
NEAR SHANKAR HOTEL,
KARIYAMMA STREET,
BELUR,
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 115.
AND ALSO AT SITE NO.8,
BEHIND KALPAVRUKSHA BAR,
HOLE BEEDI (RIGHT SIDE),
BELUR TOWN,
BELUR TALUK,
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 115.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VIJAY KUMAR T., ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE BANK OF INDIA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER,
ASSET RECOVERY
MANAGEMENT BRANCH,
MYSURU BANK BUILDING,
Digitally signed
by
ANNAPURNA
G
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
BKG COMPLEX,
A BLOCK,
2ND FLOOR, AVENUE ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 009.
…RESPONDENT
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ANNX-C
I.E.,
SALE
NOTICE
DATED
12.07.2022
A/C
NO.CC
64179529647/JPR/644 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK
FOR SALE UNDER RULE 8(6) R/W PROVISION TO RULE 9(1) OF
THE SARFAESI RULES 2002, THROUGH E-AUCTION WILL BE
HELD ON 18.082022, IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY AND ETC.,
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 21.09.2026, seeking withdrawal of the writ petition as not pressed.
2. The memo is taken on record.
HC-KAR
3. In view of the said memo, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, are also disposed off.
Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5