Karnataka High Court

WP/28508/2026 of MR.KAMAL.R. Vs MRS PUSHPA on 21 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010625472026 NC: 2026:KHC:51970 WP No. 28508 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 28508 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. MR.KAMAL. R., AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O. LATE.

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

WRIT PETITION NO. 28508 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

1.

MR.KAMAL. R.,

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

S/O. LATE. V. RAGHU,

2.

MRS.RAMYA.R.

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

D/O.LATE. V.RAGHU,

3.

MR.VISHNU.R.

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,

S/O.LATE. V. RAGHU,

PETITIONERS 1 TO 3 ARE

RESIDING AT NO. 299,

CAMBRIDGE ROAD, 1ST CROSS,

ULSOOR, BENGALURU - 560 008

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI RAJAGOPALA NAIDU, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

MRS PUSHPA,

W/O NARAYANA MURTHY

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

RESIDING AT NO. 25/10/2,

24TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN,

BHUNAVESHWARI NAGAR,

Digitally

signed by

VINUTHA B

S

Location:

High Court

of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

K.P. AGRAHARA, MAGADI ROAD,

BENGALURU- 560023,

…RESPONDENT

(VIDE ORDER DATED 21.09.2026

NOTICE TO RESPONDENTS DISPENSED WITH)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE

TRIAL COURT XVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS

JUDGE, VIDE ANNEXURE.C TO DISPOSE OFF THE SUIT BY

GIVING A DIRECTION BY LOOKING AT THE MATTER IS OF

2018.

THIS

PETITION,

COMING

ON

FOR

PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

The plaintiffs have instituted the suit seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with their possession of the suit schedule property.

2. The suit is of the year 2018. It is submitted that the suit is presently at the stage of recording the evidence of the defendant.

3. Considering the limited nature of the prayer made, notice to the respondent is dispensed with.

HC-KAR

4. Considering that the suit has been pending for more than eight years and is presently at the stage of recording evidence, this Court is inclined to entertain the writ petition.

5. The Trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit without granting unnecessary adjournments, within an outer limit of one year from the date of placing a copy of this order before it.

6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE

VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead