Karnataka High Court
WP/20314/2022 of A HRUDAYA KUMAR Vs THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER BHARATH CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010466952022 NC: 2026:KHC:51859 WP No. 20314 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 20314 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: A . HRUDAYA KUMAR, S/O LATE A DAS, AGED
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010466952022
NC: 2026:KHC:51859
WP No. 20314 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO. 20314 OF 2022 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
A. HRUDAYA KUMAR,
S/O LATE A DAS,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
R/AT NO.11/2, 6th CROSS,
OLD PENSION LANE,
BANGALORE - 560 018.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RUDRABHUSHAN C B., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER,
BHARATH CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,
(REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1959),
NO.30, 15th CROSS,
3rd BLOCK, JAYANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 011.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY,
M.T PUTTASWAMY.
2.
MRS. KAVITHA D.,
W/O GUNASHEKARA K,
AGE MAJOR,
NO.22, 'C' MAIN, 4th CROSS,
Digitally signed
by ASHWINI
MAYAPPA
MAVARAKAR
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010466952022
NC: 2026:KHC:51859
WP No. 20314 of 2022
MUNESHWARA BLOCK,
P.G HALLI,
BANGALORE - 560 003.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. LOKESH K V, ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
ORDER DATED 9.12.2021 PASSED BY THE 31ST ADDL CHIEF
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE , KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU UN
CASE BEARING CRL.MISC NO.4947/2021 VIDE ANNEUXRE-A
AND ETC.,
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. The submission is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Pending applications, if any, are also disposed off.
Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8