Karnataka High Court
WA/932/2024 of SMT SUMERA SULTANA Vs NASIR AHMED on 21 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010346782024 NC: 2026:KHC:51704-DB WA No. 932 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA WRIT APPEAL NO. 932 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA
WRIT APPEAL NO. 932 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT. SUMERA SULTANA
W/O NASIR AHMED
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
NO.85, 1ST CROSS, SAHAYADRI LAYOUT
DORASANI PALYA, AREKERE
BANGALORE-560 076
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. PRABAL P.S, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. SAILESH S K, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
NASIR AHMED
S/O NISAR AHMED
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
NO.10, AYODHYA NAGAR
J.P. NAGAR 5TH PHASE
BANGALORE-560 078
2.
BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED
3RD FLOOR, PRESTIGE TOWERS
RESIDENCY ROAD
BANGALORE-560 025
REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. A. S. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. V. SURESH, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
Digitally signed by
PAVITHRA B
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED
BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP No.16470/2023 DATED
25.04.2024 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) This appeal is preferred against the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 25.04.2024 passed in W.P.No.16470/2023. The writ petition had been filed seeking to quash the possession notice at Annexure-A dated 17.05.2023, insofar as the schedule property was concerned, and seeking a further direction to respondent No.2 not to evict or eject the petitioner from the suit schedule property.
2. It was noticed by the learned Single Judge and is an admitted fact, that the loan was taken by respondent No.1 from respondent No.2-Bank. The contention of the
HC-KAR
appellant was that she was in possession of a residential house which was mortgaged by respondent No.1 to respondent No.2.
3. It is submitted that an amicable settlement had been arrived at and that the petitioner had undertaken to make the payments to the Bank in three instalments. However, learned counsel for the appellant now submits that, in case the amounts are being paid by the appellant, the documents relating to the mortgage of the property have to be handed over to the appellant to permit her to reside in the property.
4. We are of the opinion that such a direction cannot be issued in these proceedings. In any view of the matter, since the challenge raised was against the possession notice, we are of the opinion that these contentions cannot be agitated in an appeal preferred against the disposal of the writ petition on the basis of the undertaking furnished by the petitioner.
HC-KAR
5. In the above view of the matter, we are of the opinion that there is no error in the judgment which requires correction in this intra Court appeal at the instance of the appellant herein.
6. The appeal is accordingly dismissed, without prejudice to the contentions of all parties.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.P.VIVEKANANDA) JUDGE
SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11