Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/1461/2020 of C.RAJALAKSHMI Vs MADEGOWDA T on 19 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010542962019 NC: 2026:KHC:51472 CRL.P No. 1461 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1461 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. C.RAJALAKSHMI W/O C. KRISHNAMURTHY (TDP COUNCILAR)

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1461 OF 2020

BETWEEN:

1.

C.RAJALAKSHMI

W/O C. KRISHNAMURTHY

(TDP COUNCILAR)

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

R/O VIDYANAGAR COLONY

GUDIYATHAM ROAD

PALAMANER TOWN

CHITTUR DISTRICT

ANDRA PRADESH-517 408.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. GIRISH M.K., ADVOCATE - ABSENT)

AND:

1.

MADEGOWDA T,

S/O THIMMEGOWDA

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,

R/O SINGANAMANE VILLAGE

BHADRAVATHI TALUK

SHIVAMOGGA DISRICT

PIN-577 301.

…RESPONDENT

(RESPONDENT SERVED UNREPRESENTED)

Digitally signed

by DEVIKA M

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C

PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE

LEARNED ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

BADRAVATHI DATED 27.06.2019 TAKING COGNIZANCE IN

P.C.R.NO.39/2018 AND REGISTERING A CRIMINAL CASE IN

C.C.NO.517/2019

AND

ISSUING

SUMMONS

TO

THE

PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.138 OF NI ACT AND

INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN

C.C.NO.517/2019 BEFORE THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL SENIOR

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BADRAVATHI BY ALLOWING THIS

PETITION.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

This matter is called twice in the morning and also in the afternoon, no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Having perused the material on record, relief is sought to set aside the order taking cognizance in P.C.R.No.39/2018 and registering a criminal case in C.C.No.517/2019 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act.

3. The Trial Court having considered the material on record, particularly documents of Exs.P4, P5 and other documents and the averments made in the complaint and so

HC-KAR

also sworn statement comes to the conclusion that there is a prima facie case to take cognizance for the offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act. When such reasoning is given by the Trial Court while taking cognizance, matter requires trial. Hence, no grounds to entertain the petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.

Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead